A10-7850K vs Core i3-7167U

A10-7850K vs Core i3-7167U Performance Spectrum

A10-7850K

4 / 4

3,394

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i3-7167U

2 / 4

3,368

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-7167U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-7167U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7850K

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core i3-7167U.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i3-7167U

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7850K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,368 vs 3,394).
❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7850K.

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7850K better than Core i3-7167U?

Yes. A10-7850K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7850K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7850K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7850K still makes the most sense overall. A10-7850K comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-7167U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7850K vs Core i3-7167U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7850K

The A10-7850K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,394 points. Launch price was $173.

Core i3-7167U

The Core i3-7167U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,368 points. Launch price was $304.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7850K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7167U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7850K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7850K versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7167U — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A10-7850K (base: 3.7 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-7850K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-7167U uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7850K scores 3,394 against the Core i3-7167U's 3,368 — a 0.8% lead for the A10-7850K. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7850K vs 3 MB on the Core i3-7167U.

Feature	A10-7850K	Core i3-7167U
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+43%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.7 GHz+32%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	4096 kB+700%	512 kB
Process	28 nm	14 nm-50%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	3,394	3,368
Geekbench 6 Single	510	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7850K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7167U uses BGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A10-7850K) vs 12 (Core i3-7167U) — the A10-7850K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A10-7850K	Core i3-7167U
Socket	FM2+	BGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16+33%	12

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7850K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7850K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-7167U). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7850K) and Iris Plus Graphics 650 (Core i3-7167U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7850K targets Budget, Core i3-7167U targets Mobile. Direct competitor: A10-7850K rivals Core i3-4340.