CPU
GPU
A10-7860K
Core i5-4400E
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7860K is positioned at rank 392 and the Core i5-4400E is on rank 1032, so the A10-7860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-7860K
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-4400E
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($117) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+135%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($117) | ✅ More affordable ($50) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-7860K and Core i5-4400E
A10-7860K
The A10-7860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,237 points. Launch price was $130.
Core i5-4400E
The Core i5-4400E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 October 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB + 3 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,251 points. Launch price was $266.
Processing Power
The A10-7860K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4400E offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7860K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7860K versus 3.3 GHz on the Core i5-4400E — a 19.2% clock advantage for the A10-7860K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The A10-7860K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4400E uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7860K scores 3,237 against the Core i5-4400E's 3,251 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i5-4400E.
| Feature | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+21% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4096 kB+700% | 512 kB |
| Process | 28 nm | 22 nm-21% |
| Architecture | Godaveri (2014−2016) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 3,237 | 3,251 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 450 | — |
Memory & Platform
The A10-7860K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4400E uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. The A10-7860K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2+ | BGA1364 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-2133 | DDR3L-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+300% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the A10-7860K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7860K) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-4400E). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7860K) and HD Graphics 4600 (Core i5-4400E) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7860K targets Budget, Core i5-4400E targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10-7860K rivals Core i3-6100.
| Feature | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | HD Graphics 4600 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Budget | Embedded |
Value Analysis
The A10-7860K launched at $117 MSRP, while the Core i5-4400E debuted at $266.
| Feature | A10-7860K | Core i5-4400E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $117-56% | $266 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $50 |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A10-7860K and Core i5-4400E
