A10-7860K vs Core i5-4570T

CPU

GPU

A10-7860K

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2016

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Core i5-4570T

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2013

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

A10-7860K vs Core i5-4570T Performance Spectrum

A10-7860K

4 / 4

3,237

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4570T

2 / 4

3,223

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7860K vs Core i5-4570T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7860K vs Core i5-4570T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7860K

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $78 less on MSRP ($117 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).
✅Delivers 67.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 27.7 vs 16.5 PassMark/$ ($117 MSRP vs $195 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.

Core i5-4570T

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10-7860K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (3,223 vs 3,237).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 16.5 vs 27.7 PassMark/$ ($195 MSRP vs $117 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is A10-7860K better than Core i5-4570T?

Yes. A10-7860K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.4% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A10-7860K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10-7860K is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A10-7860K is the better buy right now. A10-7860K comes in $78 cheaper on MSRP at $117 MSRP versus $195 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 67.4% better value on MSRP (27.7 vs 16.5 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7860K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10-7860K vs Core i5-4570T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7860K

The A10-7860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,237 points. Launch price was $130.

Core i5-4570T

The Core i5-4570T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4096 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,223 points. Launch price was $222.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7860K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-4570T offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-7860K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7860K versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i5-4570T — a 10.5% clock advantage for the A10-7860K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The A10-7860K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-4570T uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7860K scores 3,237 against the Core i5-4570T's 3,223 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-7860K. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 450 vs 960, a 72.3% lead for the Core i5-4570T that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A10-7860K	Core i5-4570T
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 4
Boost Clock	4 GHz+11%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+24%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	—	4096 kB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm	22 nm-21%
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	3,237	3,223
Geekbench 6 Single	450	960+113%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,719

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7860K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-4570T uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10-7860K versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i5-4570T — the A10-7860K supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-7860K supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7860K) and Intel 8 Series,Intel 9 Series (Core i5-4570T).

Feature	A10-7860K	Core i5-4570T
Socket	FM2+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133+33%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7860K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7860K) vs Yes (Core i5-4570T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R7 (A10-7860K) and HD 4600 (Core i5-4570T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7860K targets Budget, Core i5-4570T targets Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-7860K rivals Core i3-6100.

Feature	A10-7860K	Core i5-4570T
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	Radeon R7	HD 4600
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Budget	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10-7860K was priced at $117, while the Core i5-4570T came in at $195. On launch pricing ($117 vs $195), A10-7860K was $78 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-7860K delivers 27.7 pts/$ vs 16.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-4570T — making the A10-7860K the 50.4% better value option.

Feature	A10-7860K	Core i5-4570T
MSRP	$117-40%	$195
Performance per Dollar	27.7+68%	16.5
Release Date	2016	2013

Search A10-7860K on Amazon

Search Core i5-4570T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.