A10-7860K
VS
Xeon X5560

A10-7860K vs Xeon X5560

AMD

A10-7860K

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon X5560

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-7860K is positioned at rank 392 and the Xeon X5560 is on rank 687, so the A10-7860K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-7860K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5778%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5459%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3964%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1194%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
946%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
828%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
474%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
468%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
426%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
426%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
421%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
410%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
404%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
402%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
399%
#226
Ryzen 5 1600X
MSRP: $249|Avg: $144
97%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
100%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
98%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
98%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
100%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
100%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
100%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
99%
#400
Phenom II X3 710
MSRP: $125|Avg: N/A
99%
#402
A10-7700K
MSRP: $152|Avg: N/A
98%
#403
Celeron G3930TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $29
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon X5560

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
12860%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2428%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2157%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1667%
#402
EPYC 9475F
MSRP: $7592|Avg: $7592
100%
#403
Xeon Gold 6554S
MSRP: $3157|Avg: $2836
100%
#405
Xeon 6737P
MSRP: $4995|Avg: $4995
99%
#406
Xeon Gold 6342
MSRP: $2977|Avg: $3000
98%
#407
Xeon Gold 6438N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $3351
97%
#408
Xeon 6747P
MSRP: $6497|Avg: $6497
97%
#410
Xeon W-3175X
MSRP: $2999|Avg: $2999
95%
#687
Xeon X5560
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#691
Xeon E5-1650 v2
MSRP: $583|Avg: $60
99%
#697
Xeon E3-1275 v2
MSRP: $426|Avg: $426
97%
#699
Xeon E5-2658
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-7860K (2016) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-7860KXeon X5560
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($117)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Godaveri (2014−2016) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Gainestown (2009−2010) / 45 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon X5560 (2009) relies on 45 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-7860KXeon X5560
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($117)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-7860K and Xeon X5560

AMD

A10-7860K

The A10-7860K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,237 points. Launch price was $130.

Intel

Xeon X5560

The Xeon X5560 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 March 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Gainestown (2009−2010) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,231 points. Launch price was $44.

Processing Power

The A10-7860K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon X5560's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10-7860K versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon X5560 — a 22.2% clock advantage for the A10-7860K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The A10-7860K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon X5560 uses Gainestown (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7860K scores 3,237 against the Xeon X5560's 3,231 — a 0.2% lead for the A10-7860K.

FeatureA10-7860KXeon X5560
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4 GHz+25%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+29%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-38%
45 nm
Architecture
Godaveri (2014−2016)
Gainestown (2009−2010)
PassMark
3,237
3,231
Geekbench 6 Single
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7860K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5560 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-2133 memory speed. Memory channels: 2 (A10-7860K) vs 3 (Xeon X5560). Chipset compatibility: A55,A68H,A75,A78,A85X,A88X (A10-7860K) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5560).

FeatureA10-7860KXeon X5560
Socket
FM2+
LGA1366
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
3+50%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the A10-7860K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-7860K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5560). The A10-7860K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon X5560 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7860K targets Budget, Xeon X5560 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: A10-7860K rivals Core i3-6100; Xeon X5560 rivals Core i3-2100.

FeatureA10-7860KXeon X5560
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget
Workstation