A10-7870K vs Xeon E5-2418L

A10-7870K vs Xeon E5-2418L Performance Spectrum

A10-7870K

4 / 4

3,506

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Xeon E5-2418L

4 / 8

3,518

+0.3%

Core i7-3689Y

Pentium Gold 5405U

Celeron Dual-Core T1400

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-7870K vs Xeon E5-2418L FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-7870K vs Xeon E5-2418L: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-7870K

2015

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Xeon E5-2418L needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Xeon E5-2418L.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (3,506 vs 3,518).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2418L, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads.
❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Xeon E5-2418L

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads.
✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A10-7870K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A10-7870K.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2418L better than A10-7870K?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2418L makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while A10-7870K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2418L is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2418L still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2418L comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10-7870K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A10-7870K vs Xeon E5-2418L Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A10-7870K

The A10-7870K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 28 May 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,506 points. Launch price was $120.

Xeon E5-2418L

The Xeon E5-2418L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,518 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The A10-7870K packs 4 cores / 4 threads, matching the Xeon E5-2418L's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the A10-7870K versus 2.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2418L — a 64.5% clock advantage for the A10-7870K (base: 3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A10-7870K uses the Godaveri (2014−2016) architecture (28 nm), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A10-7870K scores 3,506 against the Xeon E5-2418L's 3,518 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2418L. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-7870K vs 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2418L.

Feature	A10-7870K	Xeon E5-2418L
Cores / Threads	4 / 4	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+95%	2.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.9 GHz+95%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	10240 kB (total)
L2 Cache	4096 kB+1500%	256 kB (per core)
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Godaveri (2014−2016)	Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
PassMark	3,506	3,518
Geekbench 6 Single	550	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10-7870K uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2418L uses LGA1356 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A10-7870K	Xeon E5-2418L
Socket	FM2+	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10-7870K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2418L). The A10-7870K includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Xeon E5-2418L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-7870K targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-7870K rivals Core i3-4370.