A10-9700 vs Core i3-4350

AMD

A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-4350

2 Cores4 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······

A10-9700 vs Core i3-4350 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10-9700 vs Core i3-4350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10-9700 vs Core i3-4350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10-9700

2017

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (642 vs 951).
    • Lower PassMark (3,555 vs 3,611).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 26.2 PassMark/$ ($169 MSRP vs $138 MSRP).
    • 20.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 54W.

    Core i3-4350

    2014

    Why buy it

    • +48.1% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
    • Costs $31 less on MSRP ($138 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
    • Delivers 24.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 26.2 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($138 MSRP vs $169 MSRP).
    • Draws 54W instead of 65W, a 11W reduction.
    • 100% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i3-4350 better than A10-9700?
    Yes. Core i3-4350 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i3-4350 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-4350 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i3-4350 is the better buy right now. Core i3-4350 comes in $31 cheaper on MSRP at $138 MSRP versus $169 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 24.4% better value on MSRP (26.2 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, A10-9700 can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap, but on MSRP alone you would want to find it meaningfully cheaper in real-world listings before that path becomes easy to justify.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    A10-9700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    A10-9700 vs Core i3-4350 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    A10-9700

    The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

    Intel

    Core i3-4350

    The Core i3-4350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 May 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 3,611 points. Launch price was $170.

    Processing Power

    The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-4350 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-4350 — a 5.4% clock advantage for the A10-9700 (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-4350 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Core i3-4350's 3,611 — a 1.6% lead for the Core i3-4350. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 951, a 38.8% lead for the Core i3-4350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A10-9700 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-4350.

    FeatureA10-9700Core i3-4350
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4+100%
    2 / 4
    Boost Clock
    3.8 GHz+6%
    3.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.5 GHz
    3.6 GHz+3%
    L3 Cache
    0 kB
    4 MB (total)
    L2 Cache
    2048 kB+700%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    28 nm
    22 nm-21%
    Architecture
    Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
    Haswell (2013−2015)
    PassMark
    3,555
    3,611+2%
    Geekbench 6 Single
    642
    951+48%
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    1,827
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The A10-9700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-4350 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700 versus DDR3-1600 on the Core i3-4350 — the A10-9700 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 16 (Core i3-4350) — the Core i3-4350 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700) and H81,B85,H87,Z87,H97,Z97 (Core i3-4350).

    FeatureA10-9700Core i3-4350
    Socket
    AM4
    LGA1150
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2400+50%
    DDR3-1600
    Max RAM Capacity
    64 GB+100%
    32 GB
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    8
    16+100%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700) vs VT-x (Core i3-4350). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10-9700) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 (Core i3-4350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget, Core i3-4350 targets Office Desktop. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.

    FeatureA10-9700Core i3-4350
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    Radeon R7
    Intel HD Graphics 4600
    Unlocked
    No
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    AMD-V
    VT-x
    Target Use
    Budget
    Office Desktop
    💰

    Value Analysis

    At launch, the A10-9700 was priced at $169, while the Core i3-4350 came in at $138. On launch pricing ($169 vs $138), Core i3-4350 was $31 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 21.0 pts/$ vs 26.2 pts/$ for the Core i3-4350 — making the Core i3-4350 the 21.7% better value option.

    FeatureA10-9700Core i3-4350
    MSRP
    $169
    $138-18%
    Performance per Dollar
    21.0
    26.2+25%
    Release Date
    2017
    2014

    Affiliate Disclosure

    ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

    Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.