A10-9700
VS
Pentium Dual Core T3200

A10-9700 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200

AMD

A10-9700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2 GHz2008

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9700 is positioned at rank 771 and the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is on rank 375, so the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10-9700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14815%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13999%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
10164%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3062%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2426%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2122%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1215%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1199%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1092%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1092%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1080%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1051%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1036%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1032%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1022%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
99%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
100%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
100%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
100%
#775
Pentium G2140
MSRP: $100|Avg: $95
99%
#776
Core i7-4790T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $102
99%
#777
Core i5-2320
MSRP: $177|Avg: $22
99%
#778
Celeron E3500
MSRP: $62|Avg: $10
99%
#779
Pentium G2030
MSRP: $85|Avg: $85
99%
#780
Athlon II X2 260
MSRP: $60|Avg: $12
99%
#781
Athlon II X3 445
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#783
Core i5-2310
MSRP: $177|Avg: $12
98%
#784
Core i5-5675C
MSRP: $276|Avg: $66
98%
#785
Core i5-2380P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $25
98%
#786
Core i5-4690
MSRP: $272|Avg: $120
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200

#363
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
522%
#364
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
514%
#365
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
472%
#366
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
470%
#367
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
465%
#369
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
449%
#370
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
431%
#371
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
430%
#372
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
419%
#375
Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A10-9700 (2017) utilizes 28 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($5)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+710%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
More affordable ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10-9700 and Pentium Dual Core T3200

AMD

A10-9700

The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Intel

Pentium Dual Core T3200

The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700. The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 235, a 92.8% lead for the A10-9700 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz+90%
2 GHz
Base Clock
3.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
2048 kB+100%
1 MB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
3,555
3,600+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
642+173%
235
Geekbench 6 Multi
408
🧠

Memory & Platform

Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — the A10-9700 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) — the A10-9700 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700) and PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200).

FeatureA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
Socket
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400+100%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB+1500%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700) vs No (Pentium Dual Core T3200). The A10-9700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.

FeatureA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 debuted at $64. At current prices ($40 vs $5), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 720.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 156.1% better value option.

FeatureA10-9700Pentium Dual Core T3200
MSRP
$169
$64-62%
Avg Price (30d)
$40
$5-88%
Performance per Dollar
88.9
720.0+710%
Release Date
2017
2008