
A10-9700 vs Pentium Dual Core T3200

A10-9700

Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10-9700 is positioned at rank 771 and the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is on rank 375, so the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A10-9700
Performance Per Dollar Pentium Dual Core T3200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
| Longevity | ✨ Modern (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (NetBurst (2000−2006) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+710%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($40) | ✅ More affordable ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10-9700 and Pentium Dual Core T3200

A10-9700
The A10-9700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,555 points. Launch price was $90.

Pentium Dual Core T3200
The Pentium Dual Core T3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 3,600 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The A10-9700 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10-9700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the A10-9700 versus 2 GHz on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — a 62.1% clock advantage for the A10-9700. The A10-9700 uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10-9700 scores 3,555 against the Pentium Dual Core T3200's 3,600 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium Dual Core T3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 642 vs 235, a 92.8% lead for the A10-9700 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.5 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | — |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB |
| Process | 28 nm-57% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) | NetBurst (2000−2006) |
| PassMark | 3,555 | 3,600+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 642+173% | 235 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 408 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2400 on the A10-9700 versus DDR2-667 on the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — the A10-9700 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A10-9700 supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (A10-9700) vs 0 (Pentium Dual Core T3200) — the A10-9700 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A320,B350,X370 (A10-9700) and PM965,GM965,GL960 (Pentium Dual Core T3200).
| Feature | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2400+100% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB+1500% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10-9700) vs No (Pentium Dual Core T3200). The A10-9700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10-9700 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A10-9700 rivals Pentium G4560.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R7 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | No |
| Target Use | Budget | — |
Value Analysis
The A10-9700 launched at $169 MSRP, while the Pentium Dual Core T3200 debuted at $64. At current prices ($40 vs $5), the Pentium Dual Core T3200 is $35 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the A10-9700 delivers 88.9 pts/$ vs 720.0 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual Core T3200 — making the Pentium Dual Core T3200 the 156.1% better value option.
| Feature | A10-9700 | Pentium Dual Core T3200 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $169 | $64-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40 | $5-88% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.9 | 720.0+710% |
| Release Date | 2017 | 2008 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.

















