A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-7100H

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017
Similar parts
·······

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7850B

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +6.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,441 vs 3,450).
  • Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Core i3-7100H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Core i3-7100H

2017

Why buy it

  • +0.3% higher PassMark.
  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7850B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-7100H better than A10 PRO-7850B?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10 PRO-7850B is ahead with a 6.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100H pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-7100H is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-7100H is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i3-7100H comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark. A10 PRO-7850B only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on FM2+.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-7100H makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7100H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7850B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7850B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10 PRO-7850B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-7100H uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7850B scores 3,441 against the Core i3-7100H's 3,450 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-7100H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 470 vs 1,011, a 73.1% lead for the Core i3-7100H that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+23%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark
3,441
3,450
Geekbench 6 Single
470
1,011+115%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7850B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7850B versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H — the Core i3-7100H supports 12.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7850B) and HM175,QM175,CM238 (Core i3-7100H).

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Socket
FM2+
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR4-2400+13%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7850B) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590; Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Business Desktop
Performance Laptop