A10 PRO-7850B
VS
Core i3-7100H

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-7100H

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-7100H

2 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A10 PRO-7850B is positioned at rank 1027 and the Core i3-7100H is on rank 522, so the Core i3-7100H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A10 PRO-7850B

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
38579%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
36453%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
26468%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
7974%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
6316%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
5525%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3165%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3123%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
2844%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
2844%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
2812%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
2736%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
2698%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
2687%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
2662%
#396
Ryzen Embedded R2314
MSRP: $300|Avg: $762
95%
#1027
A10 PRO-7850B
MSRP: $426|Avg: $140
100%
#1028
Core 2 Quad Q8200
MSRP: $224|Avg: $36
100%
#1029
A12-9800E
MSRP: $426|Avg: $150
99%
#1030
Phenom II X6 1065T
MSRP: $426|Avg: $170
99%
#1031
Celeron 440
MSRP: $59|Avg: $10
99%
#1032
A8-3820
MSRP: $280|Avg: $200
96%
#1033
Core i7-860S
MSRP: $299|Avg: $96
96%
#1035
Core 2 Duo E4700
MSRP: $133|Avg: $10
94%
#1036
PRO A10-8770E
MSRP: $395|Avg: $210
94%
#1037
Athlon 64 X2 5800+
MSRP: $230|Avg: $20
94%
#1038
Phenom II X2 B53
MSRP: $150|Avg: $15
94%
#1039
Core 2 Quad Q9300
MSRP: $266|Avg: $27
94%
#1040
Athlon II X4 638
MSRP: $300|Avg: $280
93%
#1041
Core 2 Duo E7200
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7100H

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#510
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
680%
#511
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
670%
#512
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
615%
#513
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
613%
#514
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
607%
#516
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
586%
#517
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
562%
#518
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
561%
#519
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
546%
#522
Core i3-7100H
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7100H (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($140)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kaveri (2014−2015) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake-H (2017) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10 PRO-7850B (2014) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3-2133, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($140)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10 PRO-7850B and Core i3-7100H

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-7100H

The Core i3-7100H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake-H (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 3,450 points. Launch price was $393.

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-7100H offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A10 PRO-7850B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B versus 2.8 GHz on the Core i3-7100H — a 35.3% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7850B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A10 PRO-7850B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-7100H uses Kaby Lake-H (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7850B scores 3,441 against the Core i3-7100H's 3,450 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-7100H. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 470 vs 1,011, a 73.1% lead for the Core i3-7100H that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+23%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Kaby Lake-H (2017)
PassMark
3,441
3,450
Geekbench 6 Single
470
1,011+115%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7850B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-7100H uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7850B versus DDR4-2400 on the Core i3-7100H — the Core i3-7100H supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-7100H supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7850B) and HM175,QM175,CM238 (Core i3-7100H).

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Socket
FM2+
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-7100H). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7850B) and HD Graphics 630 (Core i3-7100H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-7100H targets Performance Laptop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590; Core i3-7100H rivals Ryzen 3 2300U.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-7100H
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Business Desktop
Performance Laptop