A10 PRO-7850B vs Core 2 Duo T5670

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5670

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2008
Similar parts
·······

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core 2 Duo T5670 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core 2 Duo T5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core 2 Duo T5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7850B

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R7, while Core 2 Duo T5670 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $426 MSRP, while Core 2 Duo T5670 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.

Core 2 Duo T5670

2008

Why buy it

  • Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7850B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (3,440 vs 3,441).
  • No integrated graphics, while A10 PRO-7850B can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A10 PRO-7850B better than Core 2 Duo T5670?
Yes. A10 PRO-7850B is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, A10 PRO-7850B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A10 PRO-7850B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A10 PRO-7850B is the better buy right now. A10 PRO-7850B comes in at an unclear MSRP at $426 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (8.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A10 PRO-7850B makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2008) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core 2 Duo T5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5670

The Core 2 Duo T5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom-2M (2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 3,440 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The A10 PRO-7850B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5670 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A10 PRO-7850B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B versus 1.8 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5670 — a 75.9% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7850B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The A10 PRO-7850B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 uses Merom-2M (2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7850B scores 3,441 against the Core 2 Duo T5670's 3,440 — a 0% lead for the A10 PRO-7850B.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore 2 Duo T5670
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4 GHz+122%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+106%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB L2 Cache
L2 Cache
4096 kB+100%
2 MB
Process
28 nm-57%
65 nm
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Merom-2M (2008)
PassMark
3,441
3,440
Geekbench 6 Single
470
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B) / not specified (Core 2 Duo T5670). The A10 PRO-7850B includes integrated graphics (Radeon R7), while the Core 2 Duo T5670 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore 2 Duo T5670
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Business Desktop