A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-9100HL

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2014
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Core i3-9100HL

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.9 GHz2019

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-9100HL Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-9100HL FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-9100HL: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A10 PRO-7850B

2014

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +4.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (3,441 vs 3,454).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 8.1 vs 15.4 PassMark/$ ($426 MSRP vs $225 MSRP).
  • 280% higher power demand at 95W vs 25W.

Core i3-9100HL

2019

Why buy it

  • +0.4% higher PassMark.
  • Costs $201 less on MSRP ($225 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • Delivers 90.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 15.4 vs 8.1 PassMark/$ ($225 MSRP vs $426 MSRP).
  • Draws 25W instead of 95W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than A10 PRO-7850B across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-9100HL better than A10 PRO-7850B?
It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A10 PRO-7850B is ahead with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9100HL pulls ahead with 0.4% better PassMark.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-9100HL is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i3-9100HL is the better buy right now. Core i3-9100HL comes in $201 cheaper on MSRP at $225 MSRP versus $426 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that A10 PRO-7850B is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 4.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 90.0% better value on MSRP (15.4 vs 8.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-9100HL makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 4 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A10 PRO-7850B vs Core i3-9100HL Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A10 PRO-7850B

The A10 PRO-7850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 31 July 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,441 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-9100HL

The Core i3-9100HL is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 3,454 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the A10 PRO-7850B and Core i3-9100HL share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A10 PRO-7850B versus 2.9 GHz on the Core i3-9100HL — a 31.9% clock advantage for the A10 PRO-7850B (base: 3.7 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The A10 PRO-7850B uses the Kaveri (2014−2015) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-9100HL uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A10 PRO-7850B scores 3,441 against the Core i3-9100HL's 3,454 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i3-9100HL. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 470 vs 1,037, a 75.2% lead for the Core i3-9100HL that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-9100HL
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+38%
2.9 GHz
Base Clock
3.7 GHz+131%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+1500%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Kaveri (2014−2015)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
3,441
3,454
Geekbench 6 Single
470
1,037+121%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,373
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A10 PRO-7850B uses the FM2+ socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-9100HL uses BGA1440 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-2133 on the A10 PRO-7850B versus DDR4 2666 MHz on the Core i3-9100HL — the Core i3-9100HL supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i3-9100HL supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A10 PRO-7850B) and Intel 300 Series (Core i3-9100HL).

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-9100HL
Socket
FM2+
BGA1440
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-2133
DDR4 2666 MHz+25%
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
64 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A10 PRO-7850B) vs true (Core i3-9100HL). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R7 (A10 PRO-7850B) and Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Core i3-9100HL) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A10 PRO-7850B targets Business Desktop, Core i3-9100HL targets Embedded. Direct competitor: A10 PRO-7850B rivals Core i5-4590.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-9100HL
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R7
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Business Desktop
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the A10 PRO-7850B was priced at $426, while the Core i3-9100HL came in at $225. On launch pricing ($426 vs $225), Core i3-9100HL was $201 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the A10 PRO-7850B delivers 8.1 pts/$ vs 15.4 pts/$ for the Core i3-9100HL — making the Core i3-9100HL the 62.1% better value option.

FeatureA10 PRO-7850BCore i3-9100HL
MSRP
$426
$225-47%
Performance per Dollar
8.1
15.4+90%
Release Date
2014
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.