
RADEON 9800 vs GeForce 6100

RADEON 9800
Popular choices:

GeForce 6100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank #740 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2017). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 114.8% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 6100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+114.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-114.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 and GeForce 6100

RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

GeForce 6100
The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 scores 58 versus the GeForce 6100's 27 — the RADEON 9800 leads by 114.8%. The RADEON 9800 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce 6100 uses Pascal, both on 4 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800) vs 384 (GeForce 6100). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 1468 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58+115% | 27 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+567% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+1218% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+98% | 1468 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 160+567% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 6100 has 512 MB. The GeForce 6100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800) vs 0.5 MB (GeForce 6100) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1500% | 0.5 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 draws 55W versus the GeForce 6100's 30W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800) vs 350W (GeForce 6100). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W | 30W-45% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+22% | 0.9 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9800 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $399, while the GeForce 6100 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The GeForce 6100 costs 100+% less ($399 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 9800) vs Infinity (GeForce 6100) — the GeForce 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2017).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce 6100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $399 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.1 | Infinity |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GP108 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #98 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















