
GeForce 6100

Radeon 9550 / X1050
GeForce 6100 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce 6100 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce 6100 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce 6100
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 30W instead of 50W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 9550 / X1050
2019Why buy it
- ✅GeForce 6100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 9550 / X1050 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 50W vs 30W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 6100 vs Radeon 9550 / X1050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 6100
The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon 9550 / X1050
The Radeon 9550 / X1050 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 27 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 29 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6100 scores 27 versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 29 — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 leads by 7.4%. The GeForce 6100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 uses GCN 4.0, both on a 14 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6100) vs 512 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1218 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 27 | 29+7% |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+11% |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+21% | 1218 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 24 | 32+33% |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+13% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce 6100 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 9550 / X1050 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce 6100 and 64-bit on the Radeon 9550 / X1050.
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6100) vs 9_0 (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0c | 9_0 |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce 6100 draws 30W versus the Radeon 9550 / X1050's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6100) vs 350W (Radeon 9550 / X1050). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 165mm, occupying 0 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-40% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 165mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.9+50% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce 6100 came in at $0, while the Radeon 9550 / X1050 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce 6100) vs Infinity (Radeon 9550 / X1050) — the Radeon 9550 / X1050 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 9550 / X1050 (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce 6100 | Radeon 9550 / X1050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GP108 | Lexa |
| Release | May 17 2017 | March 27 2019 |
| Ranking | #641 | #772 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














