GeForce 6100
VS
Radeon X1270

GeForce 6100 vs Radeon X1270

NVIDIA

GeForce 6100

2017Core: 1228 MHzBoost: 1468 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon X1270

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon X1270 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon X1270 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 6100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon X1270 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 14.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 6100.

InsightGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-14.8%)
Leading raw performance (+14.8%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021))
GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon X1270 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce 6100 and Radeon X1270

NVIDIA

GeForce 6100

The GeForce 6100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 27 points. Launch price was $79.

AMD

Radeon X1270

The Radeon X1270 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 31 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce 6100 scores 27 versus the Radeon X1270's 31 — the Radeon X1270 leads by 14.8%. The GeForce 6100 is built on Pascal while the Radeon X1270 uses GCN 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce 6100) vs 384 (Radeon X1270). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce 6100) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon X1270). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
G3D Mark Score
27
31+15%
Architecture
Pascal
GCN 3.0
Process Node
14 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.127 TFLOPS+43%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1468 MHz+43%
1024 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
144 KB+50%
96 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce 6100) vs 128 KB (Radeon X1270) — the GeForce 6100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
512 KB+300%
128 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce 6100) vs 9_0b (Radeon X1270). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
DirectX
9.0c
9_0b
Max Displays
1
2+100%
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 6100) vs Avivo (Radeon X1270). Decoder: PureVideo vs Avivo.

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
Encoder
No
Avivo
Decoder
PureVideo
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 6100 draws 30W versus the Radeon X1270's 50W — a 50% difference. The GeForce 6100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 6100) vs 350W (Radeon X1270). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
TDP
30W-40%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
70°C
Perf/Watt
0.9+50%
0.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce 6100 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon X1270 launched at $0 and now averages $49. The GeForce 6100 costs 100+% less ($49 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce 6100) vs 0.6 (Radeon X1270) — the GeForce 6100 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon X1270 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce 6100Radeon X1270
MSRP
$0
$0
Avg Price (30d)
$0-100%
$49
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
0.6
Codename
GP108
Polaris 24
Release
May 17 2017
May 13 2019
Ranking
#641
#898