
GeForce GT 330M
Popular choices:

Radeon Xpress 1250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The GeForce GT 330M is positioned at rank #114 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Balanced cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 330M
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GT 330M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 414% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (1 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Xpress 1250.
| Insight | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+414%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-414%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GT 330M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 330M and Radeon Xpress 1250

GeForce GT 330M
The GeForce GT 330M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 221 points. Launch price was $79.

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GT 330M scores 221 versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 43 — the GeForce GT 330M leads by 414%. The GeForce GT 330M is built on Pascal while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 330M) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 330M) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250). Boost clocks: 1468 MHz vs 1050 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 221+414% | 43 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.127 TFLOPS+40% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1468 MHz+40% | 1050 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 144 KB+50% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 330M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 330M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (GeForce GT 330M) vs 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the GeForce GT 330M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11 (10_1) (GeForce GT 330M) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11 (10_1)+22% | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 330M) vs Avivo (Radeon Xpress 1250). Decoder: PureVideo VP4 vs Avivo.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | Avivo |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP4 | Avivo |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 330M draws 30W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 73.7% difference. The GeForce GT 330M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 330M) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 30W-54% | 65W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.4+957% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 330M is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 330M | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $49 |
| Codename | GP108 | Oland |
| Release | May 17 2017 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #641 | #871 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















