A4-5000
VS
Celeron G550

A4-5000 vs Celeron G550

AMD

A4-5000

4 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G550

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-5000 is positioned at rank 847 and the Celeron G550 is on rank 698, so the Celeron G550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-5000

#835
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1371%
#836
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1351%
#837
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1240%
#838
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1235%
#839
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1223%
#841
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1181%
#842
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1133%
#843
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1131%
#844
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1100%
#847
A4-5000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
98%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
98%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12713%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12012%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8722%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2628%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2081%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1821%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1043%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1029%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
937%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
937%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
927%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
902%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
889%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
885%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
877%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
97%
#698
Celeron G550
MSRP: $52|Avg: $15
100%
#700
Core i3-4370T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
99%
#701
FX-6200
MSRP: $169|Avg: $25
99%
#702
FX-4150
MSRP: $137|Avg: $20
99%
#703
Core i5-2450P
MSRP: $177|Avg: $30
98%
#704
Core i5-4690T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $98
98%
#705
Core i5-4430S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $90
98%
#706
Core i5-4440S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $30
98%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
97%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
97%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
97%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G550 leads in gaming performance. However, the A4-5000 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-5000Celeron G550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Kabini (2013−2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-5000Celeron G550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-5000 and Celeron G550

AMD

A4-5000

The A4-5000 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,284 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Celeron G550

The Celeron G550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,275 points. Launch price was $80.

Processing Power

The A4-5000 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G550 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-5000 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.5 GHz on the A4-5000 versus 2.6 GHz on the Celeron G550 — a 53.7% clock advantage for the Celeron G550. The A4-5000 uses the Kabini (2013−2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G550 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-5000 scores 1,284 against the Celeron G550's 1,275 — a 0.7% lead for the A4-5000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 158 vs 379, a 82.3% lead for the Celeron G550 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A4-5000 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron G550.

FeatureA4-5000Celeron G550
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz+73%
Base Clock
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Kabini (2013−2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,284
1,275
Geekbench 6 Single
158
379+140%
Geekbench 6 Multi
663
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-5000 uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G550 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1600 memory speed. The Celeron G550 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-5000) vs 2 (Celeron G550). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-5000) vs 16 (Celeron G550) — the Celeron G550 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4-5000Celeron G550
Socket
FT3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-5000) vs VT-x (Celeron G550). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8330 (A4-5000) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-5000 targets Entry Laptop, Celeron G550 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-5000 rivals Pentium N3520; Celeron G550 rivals Pentium G630.

FeatureA4-5000Celeron G550
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8330
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Entry Laptop
Budget