A4-6250J
VS
Core i3-550

A4-6250J vs Core i3-550

AMD

A4-6250J

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Core i3-550

2 Cores4 Thrd73 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-6250J is positioned at rank 643 and the Core i3-550 is on rank 965, so the A4-6250J offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6250J

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10917%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7927%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2388%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1892%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1655%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
948%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
935%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
852%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
852%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
842%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
819%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
808%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
805%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
797%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
97%
#643
A4-6250J
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
26350%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
24898%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
18078%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5446%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4314%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3774%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2161%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2133%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1942%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1942%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1920%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1869%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1843%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1835%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1818%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
100%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
100%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
99%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
99%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
99%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
99%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
98%
#973
Core i5-760
MSRP: $230|Avg: $61
98%
#974
Core i3-7102E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $80
98%
#975
Core 2 Quad Q8400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $128
96%
#976
Pentium Dual-Core E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
94%
#977
Pentium E2180
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
94%
#978
Pentium Dual-Core E2140
MSRP: $74|Avg: $5
93%
#979
Core i7-960
MSRP: $309|Avg: $110
93%
#980
E1-1500
MSRP: $60|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Core i3-550 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the A4-6250J in both compute-intensive tasks (0.8% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightA4-6250JCore i3-550
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Clarkdale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-6250JCore i3-550
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-6250J and Core i3-550

AMD

A4-6250J

The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core i3-550

The Core i3-550 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 May 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Clarkdale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1156. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,632 points. Launch price was $101.

Processing Power

The A4-6250J packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-550 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A4-6250J versus 3.2 GHz on the Core i3-550 — a 46.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-550. The A4-6250J uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-550 uses Clarkdale (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6250J scores 1,619 against the Core i3-550's 1,632 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i3-550. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 208 vs 437, a 71% lead for the Core i3-550 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4-6250JCore i3-550
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2 GHz
3.2 GHz+60%
Base Clock
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Clarkdale (2010−2011)
PassMark
1,619
1,632
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,320
Geekbench 6 Single
208
437+110%
Geekbench 6 Multi
899
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6250J uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-550 uses LGA1156 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 1 (A4-6250J) vs 2 (Core i3-550). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-6250J) vs 16 (Core i3-550) — the Core i3-550 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4-6250JCore i3-550
Socket
FT3
LGA1156
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6250J) vs Yes (Core i3-550). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R3 (A4-6250J) and Intel HD Graphics (Core i3-550) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900.

FeatureA4-6250JCore i3-550
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R3
Intel HD Graphics
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Entry Desktop