A4-6250J vs Core i5-2557M
A4-6250J
Core i5-2557M
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-6250J is positioned at rank 643 and the Core i5-2557M is on rank 36, so the Core i5-2557M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4-6250J
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-2557M
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4-6250J | Core i5-2557M |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4-6250J | Core i5-2557M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4-6250J and Core i5-2557M
A4-6250J
The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.
Core i5-2557M
The Core i5-2557M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,618 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The A4-6250J packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i5-2557M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A4-6250J versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-2557M — a 29.8% clock advantage for the Core i5-2557M. The A4-6250J uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i5-2557M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6250J scores 1,619 against the Core i5-2557M's 1,618 — a 0.1% lead for the A4-6250J. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 208 vs 521, a 85.9% lead for the Core i5-2557M that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4-6250J | Core i5-2557M |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | — | 1.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (total)+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 28 nm-13% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Beema (2014) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 1,619 | 1,618 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 208 | 521+150% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 882 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-6250J uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-2557M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1600 memory speed. The A4-6250J supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4-6250J) vs 2 (Core i5-2557M). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4-6250J) vs 16 (Core i5-2557M) — the Core i5-2557M offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4-6250J | Core i5-2557M |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | BGA1023 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 16+100% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6250J) vs VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-2557M). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon R3 (A4-6250J) and HD Graphics 3000 (Core i5-2557M) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop, Core i5-2557M targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900; Core i5-2557M rivals Ryzen 3 3200U.
| Feature | A4-6250J | Core i5-2557M |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | HD Graphics 3000 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Entry Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-6250J and Core i5-2557M
