A4-6250J
VS
Pentium 967

A4-6250J vs Pentium 967

AMD

A4-6250J

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Pentium 967

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.3 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-6250J is positioned at rank 643 and the Pentium 967 is on rank 1031, so the A4-6250J offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6250J

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11554%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10917%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7927%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2388%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1892%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1655%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
948%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
935%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
852%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
852%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
842%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
819%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
808%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
805%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
797%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#388
Ryzen Embedded R2312
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#389
Ryzen Threadripper 7980X
MSRP: $4999|Avg: $5200
97%
#643
A4-6250J
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
99%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
99%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
99%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
98%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#653
Core i3-4160T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $18
98%
#657
Core i3-4350
MSRP: $138|Avg: $130
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium 967

#1019
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
2397%
#1020
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
2362%
#1021
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2168%
#1022
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2158%
#1023
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2139%
#1025
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2065%
#1026
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1980%
#1027
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1977%
#1028
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1924%
#1031
Pentium 967
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
100%
#1033
Core i5-4400E
MSRP: $266|Avg: $50
100%
#1034
Pentium Dual Core T4400
MSRP: $107|Avg: $5
98%
#1037
Core i7-8665UE
MSRP: $409|Avg: $409
97%
#1038
Celeron T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
96%
#1039
Celeron Dual-Core T3300
MSRP: $86|Avg: $30
96%
#1042
Core i7-3612QE
MSRP: $426|Avg: $50
95%
#1043
A10-7300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
95%
#1044
Pentium Dual Core T4200
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
94%
#1045
A6 Micro-6500T
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
94%
#1046
Pentium N3520
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A4-6250J leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium 967 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4-6250JPentium 967
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Beema (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4-6250JPentium 967
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-6250J and Pentium 967

AMD

A4-6250J

The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

The A4-6250J packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 967 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A4-6250J versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the A4-6250J. The A4-6250J uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 967 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6250J scores 1,619 against the Pentium 967's 1,640 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium 967.

FeatureA4-6250JPentium 967
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2 GHz+54%
1.3 GHz
Base Clock
1.3 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB (total)+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Beema (2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,619
1,640+1%
Geekbench 6 Single
208
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6250J uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 967 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-6250JPentium 967
Socket
FT3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6250J) / not specified (Pentium 967). The A4-6250J includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Pentium 967 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900.

FeatureA4-6250JPentium 967
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R3
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Entry Desktop