A4-6250J vs Pentium 967

A4-6250J vs Pentium 967 Performance Spectrum

A4-6250J

4 / 4

1,619

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Pentium 967

2 / 2

1,640

+1.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6250J vs Pentium 967 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6250J vs Pentium 967: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6250J

2014

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Pentium 967 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,619 vs 1,640).
❌47.1% higher power demand at 25W vs 17W.

Pentium 967

2011

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 17W instead of 25W, a 8W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $134 MSRP, while A4-6250J mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6250J can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Pentium 967 better than A4-6250J?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-6250J is ahead with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 pulls ahead with 1.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Pentium 967 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Pentium 967 is the better buy right now. Pentium 967 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $134 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that A4-6250J is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 0.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (12.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6250J makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-6250J vs Pentium 967 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6250J

The A4-6250J is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Beema (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,619 points. Launch price was $50.

Pentium 967

The Pentium 967 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 October 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.3 GHz, with boost up to 1.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,640 points. Launch price was $134.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4-6250J packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Pentium 967 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4-6250J has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the A4-6250J versus 1.3 GHz on the Pentium 967 — a 42.4% clock advantage for the A4-6250J. The A4-6250J uses the Beema (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Pentium 967 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6250J scores 1,619 against the Pentium 967's 1,640 — a 1.3% lead for the Pentium 967.

Feature	A4-6250J	Pentium 967
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2 GHz+54%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	—	1.3 GHz
L3 Cache	—	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2 MB (total)	256K (per core)+12700%
Process	28 nm-13%	32 nm
Architecture	Beema (2014)	Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark	1,619	1,640+1%
Geekbench 6 Single	208	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6250J uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 967 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-6250J	Pentium 967
Socket	FT3	BGA1023
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	16 GB	—
RAM Channels	1	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	8	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6250J) / not specified (Pentium 967). The A4-6250J includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Pentium 967 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6250J targets Entry Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6250J rivals Pentium J2900.