A4-6320
Celeron J4005
A4-6320 vs Celeron J4005 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
A4-6320 vs Celeron J4005 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
A4-6320 vs Celeron J4005: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
A4-6320
2013Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Celeron J4005.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (433 vs 450).
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,532 vs 1,543).
- ❌550% higher power demand at 65W vs 10W.
Celeron J4005
2017Why buy it
- ✅+3.9% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
- ✅Draws 10W instead of 65W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-6320.
Quick Answers
So, is Celeron J4005 better than A4-6320?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
A4-6320 vs Celeron J4005 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
A4-6320
The A4-6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $50.
Celeron J4005
The Celeron J4005 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 December 2017 (7 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont Plus (2017) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1090. Thermal design power (TDP): 10 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,543 points. Launch price was $107.
Processing Power
Both the A4-6320 and Celeron J4005 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4-6320 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron J4005 — a 38.8% clock advantage for the A4-6320 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The A4-6320 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron J4005 uses Goldmont Plus (2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6320 scores 1,532 against the Celeron J4005's 1,543 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron J4005. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 433 vs 450, a 3.9% lead for the Celeron J4005 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4-6320 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4 GHz+48% | 2.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.8 GHz+90% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 4 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1024 kB | 4 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Richland (2013−2014) | Goldmont Plus (2017) |
| PassMark | 1,532 | 1,543 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 433 | 450+4% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 800 |
Memory & Platform
The A4-6320 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron J4005 uses FCBGA1090 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A4-6320 versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron J4005 — the Celeron J4005 supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A4-6320 supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 300% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A4-6320) vs 6 (Celeron J4005) — the A4-6320 offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A58,A68H,A75,A78,A88X (A4-6320) and SoC (Celeron J4005).
| Feature | A4-6320 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FM2 | FCBGA1090 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600 | DDR4-2400+50% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+167% | 6 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4-6320) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron J4005). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 8370D (A4-6320) and Intel UHD Graphics 600 (Celeron J4005) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6320 targets Budget Desktop, Celeron J4005 targets Entry Level Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6320 rivals Pentium G3250; Celeron J4005 rivals Ryzen Embedded R1102G.
| Feature | A4-6320 | Celeron J4005 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 8370D | Intel UHD Graphics 600 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Budget Desktop | Entry Level Desktop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4-6320 and Celeron J4005
