A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250

A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250 Performance Spectrum

A4-6320

2 / 2

1,532

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core Duo T2250

2 / 2

1,537

+0.3%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4-6320

2013

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8370D, while Core Duo T2250 needs a discrete GPU.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Core Duo T2250.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,532 vs 1,537).
❌3150% higher power demand at 65W vs 2W.

Core Duo T2250

2006

Why buy it

✅+0.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 2W instead of 65W, a 63W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while A4-6320 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike A4-6320.

Quick Answers

So, is Core Duo T2250 better than A4-6320?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A4-6320 is ahead with a 1.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 pulls ahead with 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Duo T2250 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core Duo T2250 still makes the most sense overall. Core Duo T2250 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.3% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4-6320 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2006). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4-6320

The A4-6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $50.

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A4-6320 and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4-6320 versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 80.7% clock advantage for the A4-6320 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The A4-6320 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6320 scores 1,532 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2250.

Feature	A4-6320	Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	4 GHz+135%	1.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.8 GHz+120%	1.73 GHz
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	1024 kB	2 MB+100%
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark	1,532	1,537
Geekbench 6 Single	433	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6320 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A4-6320	Core Duo T2250
Socket	FM2	PGA478
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6320) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The A4-6320 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6320 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6320 rivals Pentium G3250.