A4-6320
VS
Core Duo T2250

A4-6320 vs Core Duo T2250

AMD

A4-6320

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core Duo T2250

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.7 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4-6320 is positioned at rank 675 and the Core Duo T2250 is on rank 3, so the Core Duo T2250 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4-6320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12210%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11537%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8377%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2524%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1999%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1749%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1002%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
988%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
900%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
900%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
890%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
866%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
854%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
850%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
843%
#675
A4-6320
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#676
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#677
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#678
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#680
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#681
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
100%
#682
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#683
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#684
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#685
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#686
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#687
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
#689
Core i7-7700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $75
97%
#690
Core i3-4150T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $30
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core Duo T2250

#3
Core Duo T2250
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#4
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
95%
#5
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
94%
#6
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
86%
#7
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
86%
#8
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
85%
#10
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
82%
#11
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
79%
#12
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
79%
#13
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
77%
#17
Core i3-350M
MSRP: $130|Avg: $10
71%
#18
Atom x5-E8000
MSRP: $18|Avg: N/A
70%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A4-6320 (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA4-6320Core Duo T2250
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Yonah (2005−2006) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core Duo T2250 (2006) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA4-6320Core Duo T2250
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4-6320 and Core Duo T2250

AMD

A4-6320

The A4-6320 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 1,532 points. Launch price was $50.

Intel

Core Duo T2250

The Core Duo T2250 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Yonah (2005−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.73 GHz, with boost up to 1.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 31 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,537 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A4-6320 and Core Duo T2250 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the A4-6320 versus 1.7 GHz on the Core Duo T2250 — a 80.7% clock advantage for the A4-6320 (base: 3.8 GHz vs 1.73 GHz). The A4-6320 uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core Duo T2250 uses Yonah (2005−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A4-6320 scores 1,532 against the Core Duo T2250's 1,537 — a 0.3% lead for the Core Duo T2250.

FeatureA4-6320Core Duo T2250
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4 GHz+135%
1.7 GHz
Base Clock
3.8 GHz+120%
1.73 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
L2 Cache
1024 kB
2 MB+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Yonah (2005−2006)
PassMark
1,532
1,537
Geekbench 6 Single
433
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4-6320 uses the FM2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Duo T2250 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureA4-6320Core Duo T2250
Socket
FM2
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A4-6320) / not specified (Core Duo T2250). The A4-6320 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8370D), while the Core Duo T2250 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4-6320 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A4-6320 rivals Pentium G3250.

FeatureA4-6320Core Duo T2250
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8370D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget Desktop