A4 Micro-6400T vs Athlon II X2 210e

A4 Micro-6400T vs Athlon II X2 210e Performance Spectrum

A4 Micro-6400T

4 / 4

1,082

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II X2 210e

2 / 2

1,089

+0.6%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A4 Micro-6400T vs Athlon II X2 210e FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A4 Micro-6400T vs Athlon II X2 210e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A4 Micro-6400T

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 5W instead of 45W, a 40W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (8 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon R3, while Athlon II X2 210e needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,082 vs 1,089).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Athlon II X2 210e.

Athlon II X2 210e

2010

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike A4 Micro-6400T.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A4 Micro-6400T mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌800% higher power demand at 45W vs 5W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A4 Micro-6400T can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II X2 210e better than A4 Micro-6400T?

Yes. Athlon II X2 210e is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.6% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Athlon II X2 210e is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Athlon II X2 210e is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II X2 210e is the better buy right now. Athlon II X2 210e comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A4 Micro-6400T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A4 Micro-6400T vs Athlon II X2 210e Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A4 Micro-6400T

The A4 Micro-6400T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,082 points. Launch price was $69.

Athlon II X2 210e

The Athlon II X2 210e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Regor (2009−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The A4 Micro-6400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Athlon II X2 210e offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 Micro-6400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4 Micro-6400T versus 2.6 GHz on the Athlon II X2 210e — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Athlon II X2 210e (base: 1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The A4 Micro-6400T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses Regor (2009−2013) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4 Micro-6400T scores 1,082 against the Athlon II X2 210e's 1,089 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon II X2 210e.

Feature	A4 Micro-6400T	Athlon II X2 210e
Cores / Threads	4 / 4+100%	2 / 2
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	2.6 GHz+63%
Base Clock	1 GHz	2.6 GHz+160%
L3 Cache	—	0 kB
L2 Cache	2048 kB+300%	512 kB
Process	28 nm-38%	45 nm
Architecture	Mullins (2014)	Regor (2009−2013)
PassMark	1,082	1,089
Geekbench 6 Single	180	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 Micro-6400T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II X2 210e uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Athlon II X2 210e supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 2 (Athlon II X2 210e). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 0 (Athlon II X2 210e) — the A4 Micro-6400T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A4 Micro-6400T	Athlon II X2 210e
Socket	FT3	AM3
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3L-1333	1333
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	1	2+100%
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	8	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 Micro-6400T) vs true (Athlon II X2 210e). The A4 Micro-6400T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Athlon II X2 210e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 Micro-6400T targets Tablet. Direct competitor: A4 Micro-6400T rivals Atom Z3770; Athlon II X2 210e rivals Pentium E5300.