CPU
GPU
A4 Micro-6400T
Celeron E3200
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4 Micro-6400T is positioned at rank 843 and the Celeron E3200 is on rank 683, so the Celeron E3200 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A4 Micro-6400T
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3200
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A4 Micro-6400T | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A4 Micro-6400T | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($5) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron E3200
A4 Micro-6400T
The A4 Micro-6400T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,082 points. Launch price was $69.
Celeron E3200
The Celeron E3200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,090 points. Launch price was $52.
Processing Power
The A4 Micro-6400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron E3200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 Micro-6400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4 Micro-6400T versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E3200 — a 40% clock advantage for the Celeron E3200 (base: 1 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The A4 Micro-6400T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron E3200 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A4 Micro-6400T scores 1,082 against the Celeron E3200's 1,090 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron E3200. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 340, a 61.5% lead for the Celeron E3200 that directly translates to higher frame rates.
| Feature | A4 Micro-6400T | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz+50% |
| Base Clock | 1 GHz | 2.4 GHz+140% |
| L3 Cache | — | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB+100% | 1 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm-38% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Mullins (2014) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,082 | 1,090 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 180 | 340+89% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 610 |
Memory & Platform
The A4 Micro-6400T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron E3200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3L-1333 on the A4 Micro-6400T versus DDR2-800 on the Celeron E3200 — the A4 Micro-6400T supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron E3200 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 2 (Celeron E3200). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 0 (Celeron E3200) — the A4 Micro-6400T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A4 Micro-6400T | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FT3 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+173% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3L-1333+50% | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 1 | 2+100% |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 8 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 Micro-6400T) vs VT-x (Celeron E3200). The A4 Micro-6400T includes integrated graphics (Radeon R3), while the Celeron E3200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 Micro-6400T targets Tablet, Celeron E3200 targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 Micro-6400T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron E3200 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | A4 Micro-6400T | Celeron E3200 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon R3 | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Tablet | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron E3200
