A4 Micro-6400T
VS
Celeron G550T

A4 Micro-6400T vs Celeron G550T

AMD

A4 Micro-6400T

4 Cores4 Thrd5 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Celeron G550T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A4 Micro-6400T is positioned at rank 843 and the Celeron G550T is on rank 673, so the Celeron G550T offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A4 Micro-6400T

#831
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1356%
#832
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1336%
#833
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1226%
#834
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1221%
#835
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1210%
#837
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1168%
#838
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1120%
#839
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1118%
#840
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1088%
#843
A4 Micro-6400T
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#852
Pentium P6300
MSRP: $80|Avg: $10
97%
#854
E-350
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#856
Ryzen Embedded R1305G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $50
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G550T

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12191%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
11519%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8364%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2520%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1996%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1746%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1000%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
987%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
899%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
899%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
889%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
865%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
852%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
849%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
841%
#672
Core i5-4430
MSRP: $182|Avg: $60
100%
#673
Celeron G550T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#674
Pentium G2130
MSRP: $75|Avg: $8
100%
#676
Core i5-4460S
MSRP: $182|Avg: $50
100%
#677
Core i7-6700K
MSRP: $350|Avg: $142
100%
#679
Pentium G3420T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $40
100%
#680
Core i5-3570
MSRP: $194|Avg: $35
99%
#681
Pentium G3450T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $45
99%
#682
Celeron E3200
MSRP: $43|Avg: $5
99%
#683
Core i5-3470
MSRP: $184|Avg: $55
99%
#684
Core i5-3450S
MSRP: $174|Avg: $20
99%
#685
Core i7-5820K
MSRP: $389|Avg: $103
99%
#686
Core i3-4330
MSRP: $138|Avg: $60
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron G550T leads in gaming performance. However, the A4 Micro-6400T is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.7% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA4 Micro-6400TCeleron G550T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Mullins (2014) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA4 Micro-6400TCeleron G550T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A4 Micro-6400T and Celeron G550T

AMD

A4 Micro-6400T

The A4 Micro-6400T is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Mullins (2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FT3. Thermal design power (TDP): 5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,082 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron G550T

The Celeron G550T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,074 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The A4 Micro-6400T packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G550T offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the A4 Micro-6400T has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the A4 Micro-6400T versus 2.2 GHz on the Celeron G550T — a 31.6% clock advantage for the Celeron G550T (base: 1 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The A4 Micro-6400T uses the Mullins (2014) architecture (28 nm), while the Celeron G550T uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the A4 Micro-6400T scores 1,082 against the Celeron G550T's 1,074 — a 0.7% lead for the A4 Micro-6400T. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 180 vs 366, a 68.1% lead for the Celeron G550T that directly translates to higher frame rates.

FeatureA4 Micro-6400TCeleron G550T
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
2.2 GHz+38%
Base Clock
1 GHz
2.2 GHz+120%
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
28 nm-13%
32 nm
Architecture
Mullins (2014)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,082
1,074
Geekbench 6 Single
180
366+103%
Geekbench 6 Multi
656
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A4 Micro-6400T uses the FT3 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G550T uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3L-1333 memory speed. The Celeron G550T supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 1 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 2 (Celeron G550T). PCIe lanes: 8 (A4 Micro-6400T) vs 16 (Celeron G550T) — the Celeron G550T offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA4 Micro-6400TCeleron G550T
Socket
FT3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1333
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
32 GB+300%
RAM Channels
1
2+100%
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A4 Micro-6400T) vs VT-x (Celeron G550T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon R3 (A4 Micro-6400T) and HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) (Celeron G550T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A4 Micro-6400T targets Tablet, Celeron G550T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A4 Micro-6400T rivals Atom Z3770; Celeron G550T rivals Pentium G630T.

FeatureA4 Micro-6400TCeleron G550T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon R3
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Tablet
Budget