A6-3500
VS
Core i3-4020Y

A6-3500 vs Core i3-4020Y

AMD

A6-3500

3 Cores3 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i3-4020Y

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.5 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-3500 is positioned at rank 707 and the Core i3-4020Y is on rank 716, so the A6-3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-3500

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
12999%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
12283%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
8918%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2687%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2128%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1862%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1066%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1052%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
958%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
958%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
947%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
922%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
909%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
905%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
897%
#391
Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
MSRP: $1299|Avg: $1300
99%
#707
A6-3500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#709
Core i3-4360T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $40
100%
#711
Core i5-3470S
MSRP: $184|Avg: $37
99%
#712
Core i5-4670T
MSRP: $189|Avg: $35
99%
#713
Core i5-2400S
MSRP: $135|Avg: $10
98%
#714
Pentium G3420
MSRP: $86|Avg: $40
98%
#715
Core i5-6500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $123
98%
#716
Core i7-4770T
MSRP: $250|Avg: $39
98%
#717
Core i3-4340
MSRP: $149|Avg: $50
98%
#718
Core i5-4690K
MSRP: $243|Avg: $101
98%
#719
Core i5-4670R
MSRP: $224|Avg: $29
97%
#720
Core i5-3340
MSRP: $182|Avg: $15
97%
#721
Core i7-4770
MSRP: $303|Avg: $50
97%
#722
Athlon II X3 440
MSRP: $75|Avg: $10
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-4020Y

#704
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1013%
#705
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
998%
#706
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
916%
#707
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
912%
#708
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
904%
#710
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
873%
#711
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
837%
#712
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
836%
#713
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
813%
#716
Core i3-4020Y
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#718
Core i3-1315UE
MSRP: $312|Avg: $250
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The A6-3500 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i3-4020Y is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightA6-3500Core i3-4020Y
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Llano (2011−2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightA6-3500Core i3-4020Y
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-3500 and Core i3-4020Y

AMD

A6-3500

The A6-3500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Llano (2011−2012) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM1. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,439 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core i3-4020Y

The Core i3-4020Y is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 1.5 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,448 points. Launch price was $304.

Processing Power

The A6-3500 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i3-4020Y offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the A6-3500 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the A6-3500 versus 1.5 GHz on the Core i3-4020Y — a 46.2% clock advantage for the A6-3500 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The A6-3500 uses the Llano (2011−2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-4020Y uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-3500 scores 1,439 against the Core i3-4020Y's 1,448 — a 0.6% lead for the Core i3-4020Y. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-3500 vs 3 MB on the Core i3-4020Y.

FeatureA6-3500Core i3-4020Y
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.4 GHz+60%
1.5 GHz
Base Clock
2.1 GHz+40%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
3 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Llano (2011−2012)
Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark
1,439
1,448
Geekbench 6 Single
265
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-3500 uses the FM1 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-4020Y uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the A6-3500 versus 1600 on the Core i3-4020Y — the Core i3-4020Y supports 199.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 16 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-3500) vs 12 (Core i3-4020Y) — the A6-3500 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: A55,A75 (A6-3500) and BGA1168 (Core i3-4020Y).

FeatureA6-3500Core i3-4020Y
Socket
FM1
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
1600+53233%
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+104857500%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16+33%
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-3500) vs true (Core i3-4020Y). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 6530D (A6-3500) and Intel HD Graphics 4200 (Core i3-4020Y) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-3500 targets Budget Desktop. Direct competitor: A6-3500 rivals Pentium G620.

FeatureA6-3500Core i3-4020Y
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 6530D
Intel HD Graphics 4200
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Budget Desktop