Quadro FX 3500 vs FirePro 3D V8750

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs FirePro 3D V8750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs FirePro 3D V8750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

✅Costs $200 less on MSRP ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
✅Draws 189W instead of 274W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (265 vs 1,272).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.7 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).

FirePro 3D V8750

2014

Why buy it

✅+380% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 326.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.7 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌45% higher power demand at 274W vs 189W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

FirePro 3D V8750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 380% in PassMark G3D (1,272 vs 265), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

FirePro 3D V8750 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $200 more expensive on MSRP at $1,799 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 326.6% (0.7 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, FirePro 3D V8750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3500 vs FirePro 3D V8750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

FirePro 3D V8750

The FirePro 3D V8750 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,272 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 1,272 — the FirePro 3D V8750 leads by 380%. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the FirePro 3D V8750 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 2,048 (FirePro 3D V8750). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 3.482 TFLOPS (FirePro 3D V8750).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	FirePro 3D V8750
G3D Mark Score	265	1,272+380%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	2048+753%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	3.482 TFLOPS+460%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	128+60%
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	FirePro 3D V8750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V8750 carries 2 GB. FirePro 3D V8750 gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 64-bit on the FirePro 3D V8750. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 768 KB (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	FirePro 3D V8750
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	2 GB+700%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	64-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	768 KB+200%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the FirePro 3D V8750's 274W — a 36.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V8750). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	FirePro 3D V8750
TDP	189W-31%	274W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	254mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	90°C
Perf/Watt	1.4	4.6+229%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the FirePro 3D V8750 launched at $1799. On MSRP, Quadro FX 3500 was 11.1% cheaper ($200 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.7 (FirePro 3D V8750) — the FirePro 3D V8750 offers 250% better value. The newer card here is FirePro 3D V8750 (2014 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	FirePro 3D V8750
MSRP	$1599-11%	$1799
Performance per Dollar	0.2	0.7+250%
Codename	GT200B	Tahiti
Release	November 11 2008	January 18 2014
Ranking	#815	#423

Search Quadro FX 3500 on Amazon

Search FirePro 3D V8750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.