
Quadro FX 3500

Radeon 2100
Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3500
2008Why buy it
- ✅480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌973.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
- ❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.
Radeon 2100
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 143% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Quadro FX 3500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500
The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon 2100
The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Quadro FX 3500 leads by 341.7%. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 265+342% | 60 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 3.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 384+60% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.7864 TFLOPS+26% |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the Quadro FX 3500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 50W-74% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+17% | 1.2 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 2100 was 90.7% cheaper ($1450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon 2100 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3500 | Radeon 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1599 | $149-91% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.4+100% |
| Codename | GT200B | Polaris 24 |
| Release | November 11 2008 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #815 | #898 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














