Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon 2100

2019Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

  • 480.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 973.2% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,599 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • 278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon 2100

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,450 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • Delivers 143% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Quadro FX 3500 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 2100 is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro FX 3500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 480.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 341.7% in PassMark G3D (265 vs 60), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 2100 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 28nm process instead of 55nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2008. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,450 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 143% (0.4 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro FX 3500 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon 2100

The Radeon 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 60 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 versus the Radeon 2100's 60 — the Quadro FX 3500 leads by 341.7%. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon 2100 uses GCN 3.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 384 (Radeon 2100). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 2100).

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon 2100
G3D Mark Score
265+342%
60
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
55 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
240
384+60%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
0.7864 TFLOPS+26%
ROPs
32+300%
8
TMUs
80+233%
24
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon 2100 carries 512 MB. Radeon 2100 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 64-bit on the Radeon 2100. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 128 KB (Radeon 2100) — the Quadro FX 3500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB+100%
128 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the Radeon 2100's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (Radeon 2100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon 2100
TDP
189W
50W-74%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Slots
0
Perf/Watt
1.4+17%
1.2
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the Radeon 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 2100 was 90.7% cheaper ($1450 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.4 (Radeon 2100) — the Radeon 2100 offers 100% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 2100 (2019 vs 2008).

FeatureQuadro FX 3500Radeon 2100
MSRP
$1599
$149-91%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
0.4+100%
Codename
GT200B
Polaris 24
Release
November 11 2008
May 13 2019
Ranking
#815
#898

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.