Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8400

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8400 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8400: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 8400 across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
5230% HIGHER MSRP
$1,599 MSRPvs$30 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 9.0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $30 MSRP).

Radeon HD 8400

2012

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $1,569 less on MSRP ($30 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 5350.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($30 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 8400 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.3% in PassMark G3D (271 vs 265), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8400 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,569 cheaper on MSRP at $30 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 5350.7% (9.0 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8400 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8400 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8400

The Radeon HD 8400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 271 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 and the Radeon HD 8400 reaches 271 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8400 uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 8400). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8400).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8400
G3D Mark Score	265	271+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	1280+433%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	2.56 TFLOPS+312%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	80	80
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8400
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8400 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8400 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8400. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3500) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8400) — the Radeon HD 8400 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8400
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	512 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8400's 200W — a 5.7% difference. The Quadro FX 3500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8400). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8400
TDP	189W-6%	200W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	75
Perf/Watt	1.4	1.4

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the Radeon HD 8400 launched at $30. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8400 was 98.1% cheaper ($1569 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 9.0 (Radeon HD 8400) — the Radeon HD 8400 offers 4400% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8400 (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8400
MSRP	$1599	$30-98%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	9.0+4400%
Codename	GT200B	Pitcairn
Release	November 11 2008	March 5 2012
Ranking	#815	#460

Search Quadro FX 3500 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8400 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.