GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Quadro FX 3500

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Quadro FX 3500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Quadro FX 3500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

2015

Why buy it

✅3.6% more average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅More future proof: Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
❌32.3% higher power demand at 250W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 189W instead of 250W, a 61W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce Go 7900 GTX across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce Go 7900 GTX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 3.6% in average FPS across 38 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.9% in PassMark G3D (270 vs 265), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce Go 7900 GTX is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2015 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro FX 3500 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro FX 3500 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce Go 7900 GTX has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Quadro FX 3500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX scores 270 and the Quadro FX 3500 reaches 265 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro FX 3500 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 240 (Quadro FX 3500). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500).

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	Quadro FX 3500
G3D Mark Score	270+2%	265
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2816+1073%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	6.06 TFLOPS+874%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	96+200%	32
TMUs	176+120%	80
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 3500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	Quadro FX 3500
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7900 GTX and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 3500) — the GeForce Go 7900 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	Quadro FX 3500
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB+1100%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX draws 250W versus the Quadro FX 3500's 189W — a 27.8% difference. The Quadro FX 3500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 350W (Quadro FX 3500). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	Quadro FX 3500
TDP	250W	189W-24%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.1	1.4+27%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce Go 7900 GTX (2015 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce Go 7900 GTX	Quadro FX 3500
MSRP	—	$1599
Codename	GM200	GT200B
Release	June 2 2015	November 11 2008
Ranking	#179	#815

Search GeForce Go 7900 GTX on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 3500 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.