GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Radeon HD 7400G

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

2025Core: 1452 MHzBoost: 2300 MHz

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Radeon HD 7400G Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Radeon HD 7400G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Radeon HD 7400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

2015

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 5.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
  • 481.4% higher power demand at 250W vs 43W.

Radeon HD 7400G

2025

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 43W instead of 250W, a 207W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce Go 7900 GTX is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (270 vs 267), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon HD 7400G is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, and 28 vs 0 ray-tracing units. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 7400G makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce Go 7900 GTX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce Go 7900 GTX vs Radeon HD 7400G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce Go 7900 GTX

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points. Launch price was $649.

AMD

Radeon HD 7400G

The Radeon HD 7400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 267 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX scores 270 and the Radeon HD 7400G reaches 267 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce Go 7900 GTX is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Radeon HD 7400G uses RDNA 3.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 1,792 (Radeon HD 7400G). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7400G). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2300 MHz.

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
G3D Mark Score
270+1%
267
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
28 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
2816+57%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.06 TFLOPS
16.49 TFLOPS+172%
Boost Clock
1075 MHz
2300 MHz+114%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
176+57%
112
L1 Cache
1 MB+100%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD 7400G leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7400G carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7400G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce Go 7900 GTX and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7400G. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 2 MB (Radeon HD 7400G) — the GeForce Go 7900 GTX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0c (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 11.2 (11_0) (Radeon HD 7400G). Vulkan: None vs N/A. OpenGL: 2.1 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
DirectX
9.0c
11.2 (11_0)+24%
Vulkan
None
N/A
OpenGL
2.1
4.4+110%
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs None (Radeon HD 7400G). Decoder: PureVideo vs UVD 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264 (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC (Radeon HD 7400G).

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
Encoder
No
None
Decoder
PureVideo
UVD 3.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,WMV9,H.264
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4,MVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce Go 7900 GTX draws 250W versus the Radeon HD 7400G's 43W — a 141.3% difference. The Radeon HD 7400G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce Go 7900 GTX) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7400G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75.

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
TDP
250W
43W-83%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
0mm
Height
0mm
0mm
Slots
0
0
Temp (Load)
85°C
75-12%
Perf/Watt
1.1
6.2+464%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon HD 7400G (2025 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce Go 7900 GTXRadeon HD 7400G
MSRP
$50
Codename
GM200
Navi 33
Release
June 2 2015
August 8 2025
Ranking
#179
#229

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.