Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8280G

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8280G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8280G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3500

2008

Why buy it

✅17.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
3098% HIGHER MSRP
$1,599 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($1,599 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).
❌278% higher power demand at 189W vs 50W.

Radeon HD 8280G

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,549 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅Delivers 3158.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $1,599 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 189W, a 139W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3500 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 3500 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 17.4% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon HD 8280G instead at 270 vs 265, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro FX 3500 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 8280G makes the most sense to buy today. It is $1,549 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $1,599, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 3158.3% (5.4 vs 0.2), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 8280G is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3500 has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3500 vs Radeon HD 8280G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3500

The Quadro FX 3500 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 265 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon HD 8280G

The Radeon HD 8280G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 270 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3500 scores 265 and the Radeon HD 8280G reaches 270 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3500 is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 8280G uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 640 (Radeon HD 8280G). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3500) vs 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8280G).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8280G
G3D Mark Score	265	270+2%
Architecture	Tesla 2.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	55 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	240	640+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.6221 TFLOPS	0.992 TFLOPS+59%
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+100%	40
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8280G
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3500 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8280G carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 8280G gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3500 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 8280G.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8280G
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3500 draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 8280G's 50W — a 116.3% difference. The Radeon HD 8280G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3500) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8280G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8280G
TDP	189W	50W-74%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	1x 6-pin
Perf/Watt	1.4	5.4+286%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro FX 3500 came in at $1599, while the Radeon HD 8280G launched at $50. On MSRP, Radeon HD 8280G was 96.9% cheaper ($1549 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (Quadro FX 3500) vs 5.4 (Radeon HD 8280G) — the Radeon HD 8280G offers 2600% better value. The newer card here is Radeon HD 8280G (2013 vs 2008).

Feature	Quadro FX 3500	Radeon HD 8280G
MSRP	$1599	$50-97%
Performance per Dollar	0.2	5.4+2600%
Codename	GT200B	Venus
Release	November 11 2008	April 1 2013
Ranking	#815	#745

Search Quadro FX 3500 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 8280G on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.