A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T

A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T Performance Spectrum

A6-4400M

2 / 2

2,292

+0.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Celeron G4930T

2 / 2

2,287

0.0%

Core i7-660UM

Celeron G1620T

Pentium Dual Core T2390

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-4400M

2012

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (313 vs 599).

Celeron G4930T

2019

Why buy it

✅+91.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,287 vs 2,292).
❌Launch MSRP is still $42 MSRP, while A6-4400M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Celeron G4930T better than A6-4400M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Celeron G4930T is ahead with a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-4400M pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-4400M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Celeron G4930T is the better buy right now. Celeron G4930T comes in at an unclear MSRP at $42 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A6-4400M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Celeron G4930T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-4400M

The A6-4400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 2,292 points. Launch price was $70.

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-4400M and Celeron G4930T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A6-4400M versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A6-4400M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A6-4400M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G4930T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-4400M scores 2,292 against the Celeron G4930T's 2,287 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-4400M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 313 vs 599, a 62.7% lead for the Celeron G4930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-4400M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T.

Feature	A6-4400M	Celeron G4930T
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+7%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz	3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	0 kB	2 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	14 nm-56%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark	2,292	2,287
Geekbench 6 Single	313	599+91%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	927

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-4400M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-4400M versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T — the Celeron G4930T supports 50% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-4400M	Celeron G4930T
Socket	FS1r2	LGA1151
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	DDR4-2400+50%
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	64 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-4400M) vs VT-x (Celeron G4930T). Both include integrated graphics — Radeon HD 7520G (A6-4400M) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-4400M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-4400M rivals Core i3-2370M; Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.