A6-4400M
VS
Celeron G4930T

A6-4400M vs Celeron G4930T

AMD

A6-4400M

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Celeron G4930T

2 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The A6-4400M is positioned at rank #580 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-4400M

#568
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
768%
#569
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
757%
#570
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
695%
#571
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
692%
#572
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
685%
#574
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
662%
#575
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
635%
#576
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
634%
#577
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
616%
#580
A6-4400M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#583
Processor N100
MSRP: $128|Avg: $100
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4930T

#317
Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE
MSRP: $309|Avg: $309
109%
#318
Core i3-10305T
MSRP: $143|Avg: $143
109%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
107%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
107%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
107%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
106%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
106%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
104%
#325
Core i9-12900E
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
103%
#326
Celeron G4900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $40
103%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
102%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
102%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
101%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
100%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
100%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
99%
#334
Core i3-9100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $125
97%
#335
Core i9-10900X
MSRP: $590|Avg: $425
97%
#336
Core i7-8700T
MSRP: $303|Avg: $196
96%
#337
Ryzen 5 3600XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $357
95%
#338
Core i9-10980XE
MSRP: $979|Avg: $620
95%
#339
Core i5-8500T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $149
95%
#340
Core i9-9900KF
MSRP: $488|Avg: $350
95%
#341
Ryzen Embedded V2748
MSRP: $309|Avg: $359
94%
#342
Core i3-9350K
MSRP: $184|Avg: $150
93%
#343
Athlon Gold PRO 3150G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
91%
#344
Core i9-9900
MSRP: $423|Avg: $330
90%
#345
Core i9-9980XE
MSRP: $1979|Avg: $593
90%
#346
Core i7-10700K
MSRP: $387|Avg: $380
90%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
87%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4930T (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-4400MCeleron G4930T
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A6-4400M (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and unknown, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-4400MCeleron G4930T
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($42)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-4400M and Celeron G4930T

AMD

A6-4400M

The A6-4400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 2,292 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron G4930T

The Celeron G4930T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,287 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

Both the A6-4400M and Celeron G4930T share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A6-4400M versus 3 GHz on the Celeron G4930T — a 6.5% clock advantage for the A6-4400M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 3 GHz). The A6-4400M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron G4930T uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-4400M scores 2,292 against the Celeron G4930T's 2,287 — a 0.2% lead for the A6-4400M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 313 vs 599, a 62.7% lead for the Celeron G4930T that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-4400M vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4930T.

FeatureA6-4400MCeleron G4930T
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+7%
3 GHz
Base Clock
2.7 GHz
3 GHz+11%
L3 Cache
0 kB
2 MB
L2 Cache
1 MB (total)+100%
512 kB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Trinity (2012−2013)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,292
2,287
Geekbench 6 Single
313
599+91%
Geekbench 6 Multi
927
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-4400M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G4930T uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-4400M versus DDR4-2400 on the Celeron G4930T — the Celeron G4930T supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Celeron G4930T supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA6-4400MCeleron G4930T
Socket
FS1r2
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-2400+33%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
64 GB+700%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-4400M) vs VT-x (Celeron G4930T). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 7520G (A6-4400M) and UHD Graphics 610 (Celeron G4930T) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-4400M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron G4930T targets Budget. Direct competitor: A6-4400M rivals Core i3-2370M; Celeron G4930T rivals Pentium G5420T.

FeatureA6-4400MCeleron G4930T
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7520G
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Budget