A6-4400M vs Core i5-4260U

A6-4400M vs Core i5-4260U Performance Spectrum

A6-4400M

2 / 2

2,292

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core i5-4260U

2 / 4

2,311

+0.8%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-4400M vs Core i5-4260U FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-4400M vs Core i5-4260U: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-4400M

2012

Why buy it

✅Draws 35W instead of 512W, a 477W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 7520G, while Core i5-4260U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (2,292 vs 2,311).

Core i5-4260U

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌1362.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-4400M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-4260U better than A6-4400M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, A6-4400M is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4260U pulls ahead with 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-4260U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-4260U still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-4260U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.8% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-4260U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 4 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-4400M vs Core i5-4260U Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-4400M

The A6-4400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 2,292 points. Launch price was $70.

Core i5-4260U

The Core i5-4260U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 April 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,311 points. Launch price was $325.

⚡

Processing Power

The A6-4400M packs 2 cores / 2 threads, matching the Core i5-4260U's 2 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A6-4400M versus 2.7 GHz on the Core i5-4260U — a 16.9% clock advantage for the A6-4400M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 1.4 GHz). The A6-4400M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-4260U uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the A6-4400M scores 2,292 against the Core i5-4260U's 2,311 — a 0.8% lead for the Core i5-4260U. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-4400M vs 3 MB on the Core i5-4260U.

Feature	A6-4400M	Core i5-4260U
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 4
Boost Clock	3.2 GHz+19%	2.7 GHz
Base Clock	2.7 GHz+93%	1.4 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	3 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB (total)+100%	512 kB
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Trinity (2012−2013)	Haswell (2013−2015)
PassMark	2,292	2,311
Geekbench 6 Single	313	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-4400M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-4260U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	A6-4400M	Core i5-4260U
Socket	FS1r2	FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1600	—
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (A6-4400M) / not specified (Core i5-4260U). The A6-4400M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7520G), while the Core i5-4260U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-4400M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-4400M rivals Core i3-2370M.