CPU
GPU
A6-4400M
Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-4400M is positioned at rank 580 and the Core 2 Duo T8100 is on rank 38, so the Core 2 Duo T8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar A6-4400M
Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T8100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | A6-4400M | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Penryn (2008−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | A6-4400M | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A6-4400M and Core 2 Duo T8100
A6-4400M
The A6-4400M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FS1r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: unknown. Passmark benchmark score: 2,292 points. Launch price was $70.
Core 2 Duo T8100
The Core 2 Duo T8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 10 January 2008 (17 years ago). It is based on the Penryn (2008−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 3 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 2,320 points. Launch price was $209.
Processing Power
Both the A6-4400M and Core 2 Duo T8100 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the A6-4400M versus 2.1 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T8100 — a 41.5% clock advantage for the A6-4400M (base: 2.7 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The A6-4400M uses the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T8100 uses Penryn (2008−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-4400M scores 2,292 against the Core 2 Duo T8100's 2,320 — a 1.2% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 313 vs 380, a 19.3% lead for the Core 2 Duo T8100 that directly translates to higher frame rates. L3 cache: 0 kB on the A6-4400M vs 3 MB L2 Cache on the Core 2 Duo T8100.
| Feature | A6-4400M | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz+52% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.7 GHz+29% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 3 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (total) | 3 MB+200% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Trinity (2012−2013) | Penryn (2008−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,292 | 2,320+1% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 313 | 380+21% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 700 |
Memory & Platform
The A6-4400M uses the FS1r2 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T8100 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the A6-4400M versus DDR2-667 on the Core 2 Duo T8100 — the A6-4400M supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The A6-4400M supports up to 8 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-4400M) vs 0 (Core 2 Duo T8100) — the A6-4400M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | A6-4400M | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FS1r2 | PGA478 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1600+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB+100% | 4 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-4400M) vs VT-x (Core 2 Duo T8100). The A6-4400M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7520G), while the Core 2 Duo T8100 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-4400M targets Budget Laptop, Core 2 Duo T8100 targets Legacy Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-4400M rivals Core i3-2370M; Core 2 Duo T8100 rivals Core 2 Duo T7250.
| Feature | A6-4400M | Core 2 Duo T8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon HD 7520G | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x |
| Target Use | Budget Laptop | Legacy Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on A6-4400M and Core 2 Duo T8100
