A6-5345M vs Athlon II Neo K325

A6-5345M vs Athlon II Neo K325 Performance Spectrum

A6-5345M

2 / 2

1,122

+1.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Athlon II Neo K325

2 / 2

1,111

0.0%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II Neo K325 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II Neo K325: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5345M

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8410G, while Athlon II Neo K325 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (250 vs 736).
❌1600% higher power demand at 17W vs 1W.

Athlon II Neo K325

2010

Why buy it

✅+194.4% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 1W instead of 17W, a 16W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,111 vs 1,122).
❌Launch MSRP is still $60 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5345M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Athlon II Neo K325 better than A6-5345M?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Athlon II Neo K325 is ahead with a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, A6-5345M pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5345M is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Athlon II Neo K325 is the better buy right now. Athlon II Neo K325 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $60 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that A6-5345M is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 1% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (18.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5345M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5345M vs Athlon II Neo K325 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Athlon II Neo K325

The Athlon II Neo K325 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Geneva (2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 1.3 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,111 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Athlon II Neo K325 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 1.3 GHz on the Athlon II Neo K325 — a 73.2% clock advantage for the A6-5345M. The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses Geneva (2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Athlon II Neo K325's 1,111 — a 1% lead for the A6-5345M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 736, a 98.6% lead for the Athlon II Neo K325 that directly translates to higher frame rates.

Feature	A6-5345M	Athlon II Neo K325
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+115%	1.3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	—
L3 Cache	0 kB	—
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	32 nm-29%	45 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Geneva (2010)
PassMark	1,122	1,111
Geekbench 6 Single	250	736+194%
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	1,235

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Athlon II Neo K325 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6-5345M versus DDR3-800 on the Athlon II Neo K325 — the A6-5345M supports 66.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5345M) vs 0 (Athlon II Neo K325) — the A6-5345M offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	A6-5345M	Athlon II Neo K325
Socket	FP2	S1
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+67%	DDR3-800
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	0

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support AMD-V virtualization. The A6-5345M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8410G), while the Athlon II Neo K325 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop, Athlon II Neo K325 targets Low Power. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M.