A6-5345M vs Celeron N3350

AMD

A6-5345M

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Celeron N3350

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2016
Similar parts
·······

A6-5345M vs Celeron N3350 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5345M vs Celeron N3350 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5345M vs Celeron N3350: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5345M

2013

Why buy it

  • +0.9% higher PassMark.
  • 166.7% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 6) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • 183.3% higher power demand at 17W vs 6W.

Celeron N3350

2016

Why buy it

  • Draws 6W instead of 17W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (1,112 vs 1,122).
  • Launch MSRP is still $107 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5345M better than Celeron N3350?
Yes. A6-5345M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you 0.9% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5345M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
A6-5345M is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. A6-5345M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $107 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.9% higher PassMark. Celeron N3350 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Celeron N3350 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

A6-5345M vs Celeron N3350 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Celeron N3350

The Celeron N3350 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 August 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Apollo Lake (2014−2016) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1296. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,112 points. Launch price was $24.

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Celeron N3350 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron N3350 — a 15.4% clock advantage for the A6-5345M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron N3350 uses Apollo Lake (2014−2016) (14 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Celeron N3350's 1,112 — a 0.9% lead for the A6-5345M. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 250 vs 250, a 0% lead for the Celeron N3350 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-5345MCeleron N3350
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+17%
2.4 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+100%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)+51100%
1 MB
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Apollo Lake (2014−2016)
PassMark
1,122
1,112
Geekbench 6 Single
250
250
Geekbench 6 Multi
450
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron N3350 uses FCBGA1296 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6-5345M versus LPDDR4-2400 on the Celeron N3350 — the Celeron N3350 supports 80% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (A6-5345M) vs 6 (Celeron N3350) — the A6-5345M offers 10 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureA6-5345MCeleron N3350
Socket
FP2
FCBGA1296
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
LPDDR4-2400+80%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16+167%
6
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5345M) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Celeron N3350). Both include integrated graphics Radeon HD 8410G (A6-5345M) and Intel HD Graphics 500 (Celeron N3350) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop, Celeron N3350 targets Entry Level Laptop/NUC. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Celeron N3350 rivals AMD A4-9120.

FeatureA6-5345MCeleron N3350
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8410G
Intel HD Graphics 500
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Budget Laptop
Entry Level Laptop/NUC