A6-5345M
VS
Core 2 Duo E6320

A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320

AMD

A6-5345M

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo E6320

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.86 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The A6-5345M is positioned at rank 907 and the Core 2 Duo E6320 is on rank 1051, so the A6-5345M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar A6-5345M

#895
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1569%
#896
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1546%
#897
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1419%
#898
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1413%
#899
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1400%
#901
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1352%
#902
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1296%
#903
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1294%
#904
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1259%
#907
A6-5345M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#911
Core i7-6820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#912
Athlon II Neo K325
MSRP: $60|Avg: $25
99%
#919
Core i5-8365UE
MSRP: $297|Avg: $297
98%
#921
A6 Pro-7050B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo E6320

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
45572%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
43061%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
31266%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
9419%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
7461%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
6527%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
3738%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
3689%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
3359%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
3359%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
3321%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
3232%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
3187%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
3174%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
3145%
#1051
Core 2 Duo E6320
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
100%
#1052
Core i7-980X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $150
100%
#1053
Athlon 64 X2 3600+
MSRP: $150|Avg: $10
99%
#1054
Core 2 Duo E6420
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
99%
#1055
Pentium D 940
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
97%
#1056
Phenom X4 9600B
MSRP: $278|Avg: $20
97%
#1057
Phenom II X3 B77
MSRP: $281|Avg: $35
96%
#1058
Core 2 Duo E6300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $5
95%
#1059
Core 2 Duo E6400
MSRP: $183|Avg: $10
94%
#1060
Core 2 Duo E8300
MSRP: $163|Avg: $20
93%
#1061
Phenom X4 9500
MSRP: $247|Avg: $30
93%
#1062
Celeron D 352
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
89%
#1063
Core i7-970
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $289
88%
#1064
Core i7-880
MSRP: $583|Avg: $40
86%
#1065
Pentium D 820
MSRP: $241|Avg: $20
86%
#1066
Celeron 2.10
MSRP: $49|Avg: $49
85%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The A6-5345M (2013) utilizes 32 nm technology and DDR3, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightA6-5345MCore 2 Duo E6320
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Conroe (2006−2007) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core 2 Duo E6320 (2007) relies on 65 nm technology and DDR1, DDR2, DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightA6-5345MCore 2 Duo E6320
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($5)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A6-5345M and Core 2 Duo E6320

AMD

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Intel

Core 2 Duo E6320

The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Core 2 Duo E6320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the A6-5345M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Core 2 Duo E6320's 1,115 — a 0.6% lead for the A6-5345M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

FeatureA6-5345MCore 2 Duo E6320
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+51%
1.86 GHz
Base Clock
2.2 GHz+18%
1.86 GHz
L3 Cache
0 kB
0 kB
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
4 MB+700%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Richland (2013−2014)
Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,122
1,115
Geekbench 6 Single
250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6-5345M versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — the Core 2 Duo E6320 supports 198.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6320 supports up to 16 of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureA6-5345MCore 2 Duo E6320
Socket
FP2
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
1066+35433%
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB+52428700%
16
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5345M) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6320). The A6-5345M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8410G), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+.

FeatureA6-5345MCore 2 Duo E6320
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 8410G
None
Unlocked
No
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
true
Target Use
Budget Laptop