A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320

A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320 Performance Spectrum

A6-5345M

2 / 2

1,122

+0.6%

Mobile Athlon 64 3700+

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Core 2 Duo E6320

2 / 2

1,115

0.0%

Pentium D 830

Pentium T2370

Pentium T3400

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

A6-5345M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 17W instead of 65W, a 48W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon HD 8410G, while Core 2 Duo E6320 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Core 2 Duo E6320.

Core 2 Duo E6320

2007

Why buy it

✅Includes a boxed cooler (true), unlike A6-5345M.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,115 vs 1,122).
❌Launch MSRP is still $163 MSRP, while A6-5345M mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌282.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 17W.
❌No integrated graphics, while A6-5345M can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is A6-5345M better than Core 2 Duo E6320?

Yes. A6-5345M is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, A6-5345M is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, A6-5345M is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 2 cores and 2 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

A6-5345M is still the much better call for a fresh build. A6-5345M comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $163 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core 2 Duo E6320 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2007 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (6.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA775.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A6-5345M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 2 cores / 2 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

A6-5345M vs Core 2 Duo E6320 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

A6-5345M

The A6-5345M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FP2. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,122 points. Launch price was $70.

Core 2 Duo E6320

The Core 2 Duo E6320 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Conroe (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.86 GHz, with boost up to 1.86 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,115 points. Launch price was $249.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the A6-5345M and Core 2 Duo E6320 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the A6-5345M versus 1.86 GHz on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — a 40.3% clock advantage for the A6-5345M (base: 2.2 GHz vs 1.86 GHz). The A6-5345M uses the Richland (2013−2014) architecture (32 nm), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses Conroe (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the A6-5345M scores 1,122 against the Core 2 Duo E6320's 1,115 — a 0.6% lead for the A6-5345M. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.

Feature	A6-5345M	Core 2 Duo E6320
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	2 / 2
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+51%	1.86 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz+18%	1.86 GHz
L3 Cache	0 kB	0 kB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+12700%	4 MB
Process	32 nm-51%	65 nm
Architecture	Richland (2013−2014)	Conroe (2006−2007)
PassMark	1,122	1,115
Geekbench 6 Single	250	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The A6-5345M uses the FP2 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the A6-5345M versus 1066 on the Core 2 Duo E6320 — the A6-5345M supports 25% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core 2 Duo E6320 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

Feature	A6-5345M	Core 2 Duo E6320
Socket	FP2	LGA775
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+173%	PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1333+25%	1066
Max RAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: AMD-V (A6-5345M) vs true (Core 2 Duo E6320). The A6-5345M includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 8410G), while the Core 2 Duo E6320 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: A6-5345M targets Budget Laptop. Direct competitor: A6-5345M rivals Celeron 1005M; Core 2 Duo E6320 rivals Athlon 64 X2 4200+.