Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 6310

2011

Why buy it

✅200.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $79 less on MSRP ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅Delivers 799.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.4 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($50 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌272% higher power demand at 186W vs 50W.

RADEON 9550

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 186W, a 136W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6310 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
158% HIGHER MSRP
$129 MSRPvs$50 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.3 vs 2.4 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $50 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 6310 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 200.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 248.6% in PassMark G3D (122 vs 35), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 6310 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 6310 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $79 cheaper on MSRP at $50 vs $129, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 799.3% (2.4 vs 0.3), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Radeon HD 6310 vs RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 6310

The Radeon HD 6310 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 1 2011. It features the TeraScale 3 architecture. The core clock speed is 750 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 186W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 122 points. Launch price was $180.

RADEON 9550

The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 6310 scores 122 versus the RADEON 9550's 35 — the Radeon HD 6310 leads by 248.6%. The Radeon HD 6310 is built on TeraScale 3 while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 40 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 1.92 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6310) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9550
G3D Mark Score	122+249%	35
Architecture	TeraScale 3	GCN 4.0
Process Node	40 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	1280+150%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.92 TFLOPS+59%	1.211 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+100%	16
TMUs	80+150%	32
L1 Cache	320 KB+150%	128 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9550
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 6310 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 carries 256 MB. Radeon HD 6310 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Radeon HD 6310 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 6310) vs 256 KB (RADEON 9550) — the Radeon HD 6310 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9550
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB+100%	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 6310 draws 186W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 115.3% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 6310) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9550
TDP	186W	50W-73%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Legacy
Perf/Watt	0.7	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon HD 6310 came in at $50, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129. On MSRP, Radeon HD 6310 was 61.2% cheaper ($79 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.4 (Radeon HD 6310) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9550) — the Radeon HD 6310 offers 700% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9550 (2017 vs 2011).

Feature	Radeon HD 6310	RADEON 9550
MSRP	$50-61%	$129
Performance per Dollar	2.4+700%	0.3
Codename	Cayman	Lexa
Release	December 1 2011	April 20 2017
Ranking	#598	#668

Search Radeon HD 6310 on Amazon

Search RADEON 9550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.