GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9550

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

2022

Why buy it

✅RADEON 9550 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $129 MSRP).

RADEON 9550

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RADEON 9550 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (35 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RADEON 9550 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, RADEON 9550 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

RADEON 9550

The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 and the RADEON 9550 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	RADEON 9550
G3D Mark Score	34	35+3%
Architecture	Rankine	GCN 4.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2048+300%	512
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+291%	1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1155 MHz	1183 MHz+2%
ROPs	40+150%	16
TMUs	64+100%	32
L1 Cache	2 MB+1438%	0.13 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9550 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	RADEON 9550
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 64-bit on the RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.25 MB (RADEON 9550) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	RADEON 9550
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	RADEON 9550
TDP	25W-50%	50W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.4+100%	0.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($129 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9550) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2017).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	RADEON 9550
MSRP	$0-100%	$129
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.3
Codename	GA107	Lexa
Release	Maio 2022	April 20 2017
Ranking	#387	#668

Search GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on Amazon

Search RADEON 9550 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.