G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce PCX 5750 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce PCX 5750: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

2022

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
✅GeForce PCX 5750 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 25W instead of 219W, a 194W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌36.3% longer card at 229mm vs 168mm.

GeForce PCX 5750

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Measures 168mm instead of 229mm, a 61mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌776% higher power demand at 219W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce PCX 5750 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.9% in PassMark G3D (35 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM, a 8nm process instead of 40nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce PCX 5750 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce PCX 5750 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs GeForce PCX 5750 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

GeForce PCX 5750

The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 and the GeForce PCX 5750 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
G3D Mark Score	34	35+3%
Architecture	Rankine	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	2048+327%	480
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+237%	1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	40
TMUs	64+7%	60
L1 Cache	2 MB+113%	0.94 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+217%	0.63 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 128-bit on the GeForce PCX 5750. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB+100%	0.125 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+217%	0.63 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
DirectX	9.0a	9.0a
OpenGL	2.1+40%	1.5
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
Encoder	Integrated Decoder ONLY	None
Decoder	Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder	None
Codecs	MPEG-2	MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 159% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
TDP	25W-89%	219W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	Legacy
Length	229mm	168mm
Height	111mm	100mm
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80
Perf/Watt	1.4+600%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra was 100+% cheaper ($150 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.2 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	GeForce PCX 5750
MSRP	$0-100%	$150
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	0.2
Codename	GA107	GF110
Release	Maio 2022	December 7 2010
Ranking	#387	#497

Search GeForce FX 5700 Ultra on Amazon

Search GeForce PCX 5750 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.