CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
Popular choices:
GeForce PCX 5750
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce PCX 5750
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is significantly newer (2022 vs 2010). The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce PCX 5750 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce PCX 5750 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.9%) |
| Longevity | Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce PCX 5750 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce PCX 5750
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.
GeForce PCX 5750
The GeForce PCX 5750 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 and the GeForce PCX 5750 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the GeForce PCX 5750 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 480 (GeForce PCX 5750). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 35+3% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Fermi 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+327% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+237% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40 | 40 |
| TMUs | 64+7% | 60 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+113% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce PCX 5750 has 128 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+217% | 0.63 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0a (GeForce PCX 5750). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0a |
| OpenGL | 2.1+40% | 1.5 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs None (GeForce PCX 5750). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs None. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2 (GeForce PCX 5750).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | None |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | None |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the GeForce PCX 5750's 219W — a 159% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (GeForce PCX 5750). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy. Card length: 229mm vs 168mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-89% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Length | 229mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 100mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+600% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce PCX 5750 launched at $150 and now averages $15. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 2.3 (GeForce PCX 5750) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | GeForce PCX 5750 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $150 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 2.3 |
| Codename | GA107 | GF110 |
| Release | Maio 2022 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #387 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and GeForce PCX 5750
