GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

2022Core: 832 MHzBoost: 1155 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon X1250

2017Core: 1100 MHzBoost: 1183 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

2022

Why buy it

  • Radeon X1250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the less risky modern option long term.
  • Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
  • More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (34 vs 37).
  • Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.

Radeon X1250

2017

Why buy it

  • +8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon X1250 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 8.8% in PassMark G3D (37 vs 34), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 8nm process instead of 14nm, 16 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon X1250 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon X1250 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

AMD

Radeon X1250

The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the Radeon X1250's 37 — the Radeon X1250 leads by 8.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1250 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 512 (Radeon X1250). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1183 MHz.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
G3D Mark Score
34
37+9%
Architecture
Rankine
GCN 4.0
Process Node
8 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
2048+300%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
4.731 TFLOPS+291%
1.211 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1155 MHz
1183 MHz+2%
ROPs
40+150%
16
TMUs
64+100%
32
L1 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1250 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon X1250. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon X1250) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB
0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0b (Radeon X1250). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
DirectX
9.0a
9.0b
OpenGL
2.1+5%
2.0
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs Avivo (Radeon X1250). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (Radeon X1250).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
Encoder
Integrated Decoder ONLY
Avivo
Decoder
Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder
Avivo
Codecs
MPEG-2
MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the Radeon X1250's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon X1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
TDP
25W-50%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Length
229mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
75°C
70-7%
Perf/Watt
1.4+100%
0.7
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon X1250 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs Infinity (Radeon X1250) — the Radeon X1250 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2017).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700 UltraRadeon X1250
MSRP
$0
$0
Performance per Dollar
Infinity
Infinity
Codename
GA107
Lexa
Release
Maio 2022
April 20 2017
Ranking
#387
#668

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.