
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

Radeon X1250
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
2022Why buy it
- ✅Radeon X1250 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 50W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (34 vs 37).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Older hardware, 256 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
Radeon X1250
2017Why buy it
- ✅+8.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌100% higher power demand at 50W vs 25W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Radeon X1250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

Radeon X1250
The Radeon X1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 37 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the Radeon X1250's 37 — the Radeon X1250 leads by 8.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1250 uses GCN 4.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 512 (Radeon X1250). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (Radeon X1250). Boost clocks: 1155 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 34 | 37+9% |
| Architecture | Rankine | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.731 TFLOPS+291% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1155 MHz | 1183 MHz+2% |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 2 MB+1438% | 0.13 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1250 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and 64-bit on the Radeon X1250. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon X1250) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9.0b (Radeon X1250). OpenGL: 2.1 vs 2.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0b |
| OpenGL | 2.1+5% | 2.0 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: Integrated Decoder ONLY (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs Avivo (Radeon X1250). Decoder: Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder vs Avivo. Supported codecs: MPEG-2 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 (Radeon X1250).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | Integrated Decoder ONLY | Avivo |
| Decoder | Integrated MPEG-2 Decoder | Avivo |
| Codecs | MPEG-2 | MPEG-2,MPEG-4,WMV9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the Radeon X1250's 50W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (Radeon X1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 25W-50% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 1.4+100% | 0.7 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra came in at $0, while the Radeon X1250 launched at $0. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs Infinity (Radeon X1250) — the Radeon X1250 offers NaN% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 Ultra (2022 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 Ultra | Radeon X1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | GA107 | Lexa |
| Release | Maio 2022 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #387 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














