GeForce FX 5700 Ultra vs Quadro FX 1100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is significantly newer (2022 vs 2008). The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 1100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Quadro FX 1100 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.9% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.

Insight	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+5.9%)
Longevity	Ampere (2020−2025) (8nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+0%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 1100 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra Benchmark Check

Quadro FX 1100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 Ultra and Quadro FX 1100

GeForce FX 5700 Ultra

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in Maio 2022. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock ranges from 832 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 16 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 34 points.

Quadro FX 1100

The Quadro FX 1100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra scores 34 versus the Quadro FX 1100's 36 — the Quadro FX 1100 leads by 5.9%. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 1100 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 240 (Quadro FX 1100). Raw compute: 4.731 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 1100).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
G3D Mark Score	34	36+6%
Architecture	Rankine	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	8 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	2048+753%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	4.731 TFLOPS+660%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	64	80+25%
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.25 MB (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB+700%	0.25 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 9_0a (Quadro FX 1100). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
DirectX	9.0a	9_0a
Max Displays	2	2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra draws 25W versus the Quadro FX 1100's 189W — a 153.3% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 350W (Quadro FX 1100). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 190mm, occupying 1 vs 1 slots.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700 Ultra	Quadro FX 1100
TDP	25W-87%	189W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	229mm	190mm
Height	111mm	—
Slots	1	1
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	1.4+600%	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro FX 1100 launched at $0 and now averages $500. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra costs 100+% less ($500 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (GeForce FX 5700 Ultra) vs 0.1 (Quadro FX 1100) — the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 Ultra is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2008).