
RADEON 9500

RADEON 9550
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON 9550 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON 9550 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON 9550: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
RADEON 9500
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌38.8% HIGHER MSRP$179 MSRPvs$129 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.3 G3D/$ ($179 MSRP vs $129 MSRP).
- ❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.
RADEON 9550
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($129 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.3 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($129 MSRP vs $179 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2017 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
RADEON 9500 vs RADEON 9550 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

RADEON 9500
The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

RADEON 9550
The RADEON 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1100 MHz to 1183 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 35 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The RADEON 9500 scores 36 and the RADEON 9550 reaches 35 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The RADEON 9500 is built on GCN 3.0 while the RADEON 9550 uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (RADEON 9500) vs 512 (RADEON 9550). Raw compute: 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500) vs 1.211 TFLOPS (RADEON 9550). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1183 MHz.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 36+3% | 35 |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048+300% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 4.096 TFLOPS+238% | 1.211 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1183 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 128+300% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB+300% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9500 has 128 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9550 carries 256 MB. RADEON 9550 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the RADEON 9500 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9550. L2 Cache: 512 KB (RADEON 9500) vs 256 KB (RADEON 9550) — the RADEON 9500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.25 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9500 draws 95W versus the RADEON 9550's 50W — a 62.1% difference. The RADEON 9550 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9500) vs 350W (RADEON 9550). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 95W | 50W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Perf/Watt | 0.4 | 0.7+75% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the RADEON 9500 came in at $179, while the RADEON 9550 launched at $129. On MSRP, RADEON 9550 was 27.9% cheaper ($50 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (RADEON 9500) vs 0.3 (RADEON 9550) — the RADEON 9550 offers 50% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9550 (2017 vs 2015).
| Feature | RADEON 9500 | RADEON 9550 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $179 | $129-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | 0.3+50% |
| Codename | Amethyst | Lexa |
| Release | September 29 2015 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #420 | #668 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














