GeForce FX 5700 vs RADEON 9500

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

RADEON 9500

2015Core: 735 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce FX 5700 vs RADEON 9500 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 vs RADEON 9500 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 vs RADEON 9500: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700

2010

Why buy it

  • +13.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 130.5% higher power demand at 219W vs 95W.

RADEON 9500

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $20 less on MSRP ($179 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • Draws 95W instead of 219W, a 124W reduction.
  • More future proof: GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark G3D performance (36 vs 41).
  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2015 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 13.9% in PassMark G3D (41 vs 36), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $20 more expensive on MSRP at $199 vs $179, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 2.4% (0.2 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5700 vs RADEON 9500 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

AMD

RADEON 9500

The RADEON 9500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 29 2015. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 735 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 95W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 36 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the RADEON 9500's 36 — the GeForce FX 5700 leads by 13.9%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the RADEON 9500 uses GCN 3.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 2,048 (RADEON 9500). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 4.096 TFLOPS (RADEON 9500).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700RADEON 9500
G3D Mark Score
41+14%
36
Architecture
Rankine
GCN 3.0
Process Node
40 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
480
2048+327%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS
4.096 TFLOPS+192%
ROPs
40+25%
32
TMUs
60
128+113%
L1 Cache
960 KB+88%
512 KB
L2 Cache
640 KB+25%
512 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The RADEON 9500 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700RADEON 9500
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the RADEON 9500 carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 64-bit on the RADEON 9500. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 512 KB (RADEON 9500) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700RADEON 9500
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
128-bit+100%
64-bit
L2 Cache
640 KB+25%
512 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the RADEON 9500's 95W — a 79% difference. The RADEON 9500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (RADEON 9500). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700RADEON 9500
TDP
219W
95W-57%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
0.2
0.4+100%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 came in at $199, while the RADEON 9500 launched at $179. On MSRP, RADEON 9500 was 10.1% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.2 (RADEON 9500) — the RADEON 9500 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is RADEON 9500 (2015 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700RADEON 9500
MSRP
$199
$179-10%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
0.2
Codename
GF110
Amethyst
Release
December 7 2010
September 29 2015
Ranking
#497
#420

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.