CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 350M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5700 is positioned at rank 367 and the Quadro FX 350M is on rank 228, so the Quadro FX 350M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 350M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 350M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 9.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-9.8%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+9.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 350M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 and Quadro FX 350M
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Quadro FX 350M
The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 9.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41 | 45+10% |
| Architecture | Rankine | Tesla 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+100% | 240 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+126% | 0.6221 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+25% | 32 |
| TMUs | 60 | 80+33% |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 256 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 350M) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.25 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 189W-14% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2008).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Quadro FX 350M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | — |
| Codename | GF110 | GT200B |
| Release | December 7 2010 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #497 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 and Quadro FX 350M
