GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX 350M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX 350M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX 350M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (41 vs 45).
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌15.9% higher power demand at 219W vs 189W.

Quadro FX 350M

2008

Why buy it

✅+9.8% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Draws 189W instead of 219W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2008 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro FX 350M is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 9.8% in PassMark G3D (45 vs 41), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce FX 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 40nm process instead of 55nm and a newer 2010 generation instead of 2008. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro FX 350M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Quadro FX 350M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

Quadro FX 350M

The Quadro FX 350M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 45 points. Launch price was $3,499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the Quadro FX 350M's 45 — the Quadro FX 350M leads by 9.8%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Quadro FX 350M uses Tesla 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 240 (Quadro FX 350M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 350M).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
G3D Mark Score	41	45+10%
Architecture	Rankine	Tesla 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	55 nm
Shading Units	480+100%	240
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS+126%	0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	60	80+33%
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro FX 350M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 256 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 64-bit on the Quadro FX 350M. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (Quadro FX 350M) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.25 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0c (Quadro FX 350M). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
DirectX	9.0a	9.0c
OpenGL	1.5	2.1+40%
Max Displays	1	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Quadro FX 350M's 189W — a 14.7% difference. The Quadro FX 350M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Quadro FX 350M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
TDP	219W	189W-14%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	—	80
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce FX 5700 (2010 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Quadro FX 350M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF110	GT200B
Release	December 7 2010	November 11 2008
Ranking	#497	#815

Search GeForce FX 5700 on Amazon

Search Quadro FX 350M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.