GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌157.6% higher power demand at 219W vs 85W.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

2019

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce FX 5700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Xpress 1300M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 219W, a 134W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce FX 5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (41 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Xpress 1300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce FX 5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce FX 5700 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Xpress 1300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Xpress 1300M

The Radeon Xpress 1300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 and the Radeon Xpress 1300M reaches 40 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1,280 (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1300M).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
G3D Mark Score	41+3%	40
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	480	1280+167%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS+128%
ROPs	40+25%	32
TMUs	60	80+33%
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1300M carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1300M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1300M. L2 Cache: 0.63 MB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon Xpress 1300M) — the Radeon Xpress 1300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	0.63 MB	2 MB+217%

🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
Max Displays	1	1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon Xpress 1300M's 85W — a 88.2% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1300M). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
TDP	219W	85W-61%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Slots	1	0-100%
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.5+150%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1300M (2019 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon Xpress 1300M
MSRP	$199	—
Codename	GF110	Navi 14
Release	December 7 2010	November 13 2019
Ranking	#497	#403

Search GeForce FX 5700 on Amazon

Search Radeon Xpress 1300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.