
GeForce FX 5700

Radeon Xpress 1250
GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1250: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce FX 5700
2010Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌236.9% higher power demand at 219W vs 65W.
Radeon Xpress 1250
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 219W, a 154W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon Xpress 1250 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Xpress 1250
The Radeon Xpress 1250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1050 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 65W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 and the Radeon Xpress 1250 reaches 43 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon Xpress 1250 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 384 (Radeon Xpress 1250). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.8064 TFLOPS (Radeon Xpress 1250).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41 | 43+5% |
| Architecture | Rankine | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 480+25% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+74% | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+400% | 8 |
| TMUs | 60+150% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+900% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Xpress 1250 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 carries 512 MB. Radeon Xpress 1250 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon Xpress 1250. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9_0b (Radeon Xpress 1250). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0b |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon Xpress 1250's 65W — a 108.5% difference. The Radeon Xpress 1250 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Radeon Xpress 1250). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 65W-70% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.7+250% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 came in at $199, while the Radeon Xpress 1250 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Xpress 1250 was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5700) vs Infinity (Radeon Xpress 1250) — the Radeon Xpress 1250 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Xpress 1250 (2013 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon Xpress 1250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 0.2 | Infinity |
| Codename | GF110 | Oland |
| Release | December 7 2010 | October 8 2013 |
| Ranking | #497 | #871 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














