CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1400
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5700 is positioned at rank 367 and the Mobility Radeon X1400 is on rank 704, so the GeForce FX 5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1400
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.9% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX 5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.9%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2009 / TeraScale (2005−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $49), it costs 69% less, resulting in a 211.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+211.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 and Mobility Radeon X1400
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Mobility Radeon X1400
The Mobility Radeon X1400 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2009. It features the TeraScale architecture. The core clock speed is 550 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 43 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 and the Mobility Radeon X1400 reaches 43 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Mobility Radeon X1400 uses TeraScale, both on 40 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1400). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.88 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1400).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41 | 43+5% |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 55 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+60% | 0.88 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+500% | 160 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1400 has 128 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1400) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0c (9_3) (Mobility Radeon X1400). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c (9_3) |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Mobility Radeon X1400's 30W — a 151.8% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1400 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1400). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 30W-86% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 1.4+600% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon X1400 launched at $49 and now averages $49. The GeForce FX 5700 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.9 (Mobility Radeon X1400) — the GeForce FX 5700 offers 200% better value. The GeForce FX 5700 is the newer GPU (2010 vs 2009).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7+200% | 0.9 |
| Codename | GF110 | M98 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 9 2009 |
| Ranking | #497 | #927 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 and Mobility Radeon X1400
