GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon X1600

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon X1600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon X1600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 219W instead of 255W, a 36W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (41 vs 49).
❌Less VRAM, with 256 MB vs 512 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).

Radeon X1600

2020

Why buy it

✅+19.5% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Delivers 19.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0.2 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (512 MB vs 256 MB).
✅GeForce FX 5700 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon X1600 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 512 MB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌16.4% higher power demand at 255W vs 219W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon X1600 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 19.5% in PassMark G3D (49 vs 41), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon X1600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 512 MB vs 256 MB of VRAM, the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 40nm, and a newer 2020 generation instead of 2010. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon X1600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is priced the same on MSRP at $199 vs $199, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 19.5% (0.2 vs 0.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce FX 5700 vs Radeon X1600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon X1600

The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 19.5%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
G3D Mark Score	41	49+20%
Architecture	Rankine	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	40 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	480	4608+860%
Compute (TFLOPS)	1.405 TFLOPS	19.4 TFLOPS+1281%
ROPs	40	64+60%
TMUs	60	288+380%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce FX 5700 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon X1600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 carries 512 MB. Radeon X1600 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 64-bit on the Radeon X1600.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
VRAM Capacity	0.25 GB	0.5 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
DirectX	9.0a	9_0c
Max Displays	1	2+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 15.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
TDP	219W-14%	255W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	Legacy	PCIe-powered
Length	—	168mm
Slots	1	1
Perf/Watt	0.2	0.2

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 came in at $199, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 0.2 (Radeon X1600) — the Radeon X1600 offers 0% better value. The newer card here is Radeon X1600 (2020 vs 2010).

Feature	GeForce FX 5700	Radeon X1600
MSRP	$199	$199
Performance per Dollar	0.2	0.2
Codename	GF110	Navi 21
Release	December 7 2010	October 28 2020
Ranking	#497	#34

Search GeForce FX 5700 on Amazon

Search Radeon X1600 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.