CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Radeon X1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5700 is positioned at rank 367 and the Radeon X1600 is on rank 364, so the Radeon X1600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Per Dollar Radeon X1600
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon X1600 is significantly newer (2020 vs 2010). The Radeon X1600 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX 5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon X1600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 19.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (512 MB vs 256 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce FX 5700.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-19.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+19.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $49 for the Radeon X1600, it costs 69% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 173.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+173.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($15) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 and Radeon X1600
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Radeon X1600
The Radeon X1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 28 2020. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2105 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 255W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 49 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 versus the Radeon X1600's 49 — the Radeon X1600 leads by 19.5%. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Radeon X1600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 40 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 4,608 (Radeon X1600). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 19.4 TFLOPS (Radeon X1600).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41 | 49+20% |
| Architecture | Rankine | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 4608+860% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS | 19.4 TFLOPS+1281% |
| ROPs | 40 | 64+60% |
| TMUs | 60 | 288+380% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon X1600 has 512 MB. The Radeon X1600 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB | 0.5 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9_0c (Radeon X1600). Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9_0c |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Radeon X1600's 255W — a 15.2% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Radeon X1600). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W-14% | 255W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Slots | 1 | 1 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Radeon X1600 launched at $199 and now averages $49. The GeForce FX 5700 costs 69.4% less ($34 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1.0 (Radeon X1600) — the GeForce FX 5700 offers 170% better value. The Radeon X1600 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2010).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Radeon X1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15-69% | $49 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7+170% | 1.0 |
| Codename | GF110 | Navi 21 |
| Release | December 7 2010 | October 28 2020 |
| Ranking | #497 | #34 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 and Radeon X1600
