CPU
GPU
GeForce FX 5700
Popular choices:
Mobility Radeon X1300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce FX 5700 is positioned at rank 367 and the Mobility Radeon X1300 is on rank 708, so the GeForce FX 5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX 5700
Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon X1300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce FX 5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (256 MB vs 128 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Mobility Radeon X1300.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce FX 5700 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce FX 5700 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $15), it costs 0% less, resulting in a 2.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce FX 5700 and Mobility Radeon X1300
GeForce FX 5700
The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.
Mobility Radeon X1300
The Mobility Radeon X1300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 and the Mobility Radeon X1300 reaches 40 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the Mobility Radeon X1300 uses TeraScale 2, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon X1300). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon X1300).
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 41+3% | 40 |
| Architecture | Rankine | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 480 | 800+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.405 TFLOPS+25% | 1.12 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 40+150% | 16 |
| TMUs | 60+50% | 40 |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+1100% | 80 KB |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce FX 5700 comes with 256 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon X1300 has 128 MB. The GeForce FX 5700 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 256 KB (Mobility Radeon X1300) — the GeForce FX 5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.25 GB+100% | 0.125 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 640 KB+150% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0c (Mobility Radeon X1300). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 2.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 1.5 | 2.1+40% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 2+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the Mobility Radeon X1300's 50W — a 125.7% difference. The Mobility Radeon X1300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon X1300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 219W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70 |
| Perf/Watt | 0.2 | 0.8+300% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce FX 5700 launched at $199 MSRP and currently averages $15, while the Mobility Radeon X1300 launched at $49 and now averages $15. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 2.7 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 2.7 (Mobility Radeon X1300) — the Mobility Radeon X1300 offers 0% better value.
| Feature | GeForce FX 5700 | Mobility Radeon X1300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199 | $49-75% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $15 | $15 |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.7 | 2.7 |
| Codename | GF110 | Broadway |
| Release | December 7 2010 | January 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #497 | #846 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce FX 5700 and Mobility Radeon X1300
