GeForce FX 5700 vs GeForce FX 5900XT

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

2010Core: 732 MHz
Similar parts
······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900XT

2011Core: 607 MHz
Similar parts
······

GeForce FX 5700 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce FX 5700 vs GeForce FX 5900XT FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce FX 5700 vs GeForce FX 5900XT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce FX 5700

2010

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 0.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (256 MB vs 128 MB).
  • Draws 219W instead of 365W, a 146W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 256 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce FX 5900XT

2011

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 128 MB vs 256 MB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 128 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 0.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
  • 66.7% higher power demand at 365W vs 219W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce FX 5700 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (41 vs 40), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce FX 5700 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 256 MB vs 128 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce FX 5700 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce FX 5700 vs GeForce FX 5900XT Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5700

The GeForce FX 5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 41 points. Launch price was $349.

NVIDIA

GeForce FX 5900XT

The GeForce FX 5900XT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 24 2011. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 607 MHz. It has 1024 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 365W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 40 points. Launch price was $699.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce FX 5700 scores 41 and the GeForce FX 5900XT reaches 40 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce FX 5700 is built on Rankine while the GeForce FX 5900XT uses Rankine, both on a 40 nm process. Shader units: 480 (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1,024 (GeForce FX 5900XT). Raw compute: 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX 5700) vs 1.244 TFLOPS ×2 (GeForce FX 5900XT).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
G3D Mark Score
41+3%
40
Architecture
Rankine
Rankine
Process Node
40 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
480
1024 ×2+113%
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.405 TFLOPS+13%
1.244 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs
40
48 ×2+20%
TMUs
60
64 ×2+7%
L1 Cache
0.94 MB
1 MB+6%
L2 Cache
640 KB
768 KB+20%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce FX 5700 has 256 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX 5900XT carries 128 MB. GeForce FX 5700 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5700 and 128-bit on the GeForce FX 5900XT. L2 Cache: 640 KB (GeForce FX 5700) vs 768 KB (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
VRAM Capacity
0.25 GB+100%
0.125 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
640 KB
768 KB+20%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 9.0a (GeForce FX 5700) vs 9.0a (GeForce FX 5900XT). OpenGL: 1.5 vs 1.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
DirectX
9.0a
9.0a
OpenGL
1.5
1.5
Max Displays
1
1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce FX 5700 draws 219W versus the GeForce FX 5900XT's 365W — a 50% difference. The GeForce FX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce FX 5700) vs 350W (GeForce FX 5900XT). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
TDP
219W-40%
365W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
Legacy
Length
218mm
Slots
1
1
Perf/Watt
0.2+100%
0.1
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce FX 5700 came in at $199, while the GeForce FX 5900XT launched at $0. On MSRP, GeForce FX 5900XT was 100+% cheaper ($199 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 0.2 (GeForce FX 5700) vs Infinity (GeForce FX 5900XT) — the GeForce FX 5900XT offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is GeForce FX 5900XT (2011 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce FX 5700GeForce FX 5900XT
MSRP
$199
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
0.2
Infinity
Codename
GF110
GF110
Release
December 7 2010
March 24 2011
Ranking
#497
#555

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.